HOW MIGHT HAVE DEMOCRITUS REPLIED TO THEOPHRASTUS’ OBJECTIONS CONCERNING VISION?

Main Article Content

IRINA DERETIĆ

Abstract

In this paper, Democritus’ account of vision is critically discussed taking into account primarily Theophrastus’ De sensibus. I endeavor to demonstrate that Democritus used the other explanatory model of perception apart from the causal and materialistic. There is a testimony suggesting that Democritus employed the mathematical knowledge in order to elucidate some aspects of vision. Furthermore, the explanatory value of the wax analogy is discussed in detail. Despite Theophrastus’ well thought out criticism, the author’s intention is to demonstrate that Democritus created the sophisticated and advanced theory of vision, which can be successfully defended from Theophrastus’ objections.

Article Details

How to Cite
DERETIĆ, I. (2018). HOW MIGHT HAVE DEMOCRITUS REPLIED TO THEOPHRASTUS’ OBJECTIONS CONCERNING VISION?. Arhe, 14(28), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2018.28.143-156
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

Aristotle, On the Heavens, in: Barnes, J. (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 1, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984, 447-511.

Avotins I., “Alexander of Aphrodisias on vision in the atomists”, Classical Quaterly, Vol. 30 (1980), 429-454.

Baldes, R. W., “Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One?”, Phronesis, Vol. 20, No. 2, (1975), 93-105.

Baldes, R. W., “Democritus on the Nature and Perception of ‘Black’ and ‘White’”, Phronesis, Vol. 23, No. 2 (1978), 87-100.

Baltussen, H., Theophrastus against the Presocratics and Plato, Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2000.

Barnes, J., The Presocratic Philosophers, London, Routledge, 1982.

Brancacci, A., Morel P. M. (eds.), Democritus: Science, The Arts, and the Care of the Soul, Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Democritus (Paris, 18-20 September 2003), Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2007.

Burkert, W., “Air-Imprints or Eidola: Democritus' Aetiology of Vision”, Illinois Classical Studies, Vol. 2 (1977), 97-109.

Diels, H. und Kranz, W. 1964. Die Fragmente der Vosokratiker. Zürich/Berlin: Weidmann.

English, R. B., “Democritus’ Theory of Sense Perception”, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 46 (1915), 217-227.

Fritz, K. von, “Democritus’ Theory of Vision”, in: Underwood, E. A. (ed.), Science, Medicine and History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1953, 83-99.

Guthrie, W. K. C., A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2, The Presocratic Tradition From Parmenides to Democritus, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969.

Luria, S. R., Democritea, Leningrad, 1970.

Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, tr. by Martin Ferguson Smith, Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company, 2001.

O'Brien, D., “Théories atomiste de la vision: Démocrit et le problème de la fourmi céleste”, in: L. Benakis (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Congress on Democritus (Xanthi), 1984, 27-57.

Plato: The Timaeus, in: Cooper, J. M. and Hutchinson, D. S., Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing House, 1997, 1224-1292.

Rudolph, K., Reading Theophrastus: A Reconstruction of Democritus' Physics of Perception, doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, University of Cambridge, 2009.

Rudolph, K., “Democritus’ Perspective Theory of Vision”, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 131 (2011), 67-83.

Rudolph, K., “Democritus’ Ophthalmology”, The Classical Quarterly, Vol. 62, Iss. 2 (2012), 496-501.

Stratton, G. M., Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle, Californian University, Semicentennial Publications, 1917.

Taylor, C. C. W. (transl.), The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus, Toronto, Buffalo, London, University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 1999.