A NEW INTERPRETATION OF AQUINAS' "THIRD WAY"

Main Article Content

GORAN RUJEVIĆ

Abstract

Thomas Aquinas is known for his five arguments for God's existence, and of these "Five Ways", the third one is known as the argument from contingency, wherein the necessity of a necessary being is demonstrated. We submit this "Third Way" to argumentational analysis, which uncovers the existence of two distinct interpretations of this argument of reduction to absurdity. The interpretation based on finding a contradiction with experiential facts is shown as inadequate due to having its conclusions based on problematic observation selection effects. The interpretation based on finding a contradiction with a priori truths is shown as insufficient, as it does not posess the required a priori content. As a solution to these objections, we propose a new interpretation, one where the "Third Way" argument is regarded in conjunction with the "Second Way" argument, which then supplies the required a priori content needed for establishing a contradiction, all the while avoiding the pitfalls of observation selection effects. The proposed solution can be subjected to further evaluation and critique.

Article Details

How to Cite
RUJEVIĆ, G. (2020). A NEW INTERPRETATION OF AQUINAS’ "THIRD WAY". Arhe, 16(31), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2019.31.65-84
Section
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

References

Aquinas, Thomas, The Summa contra Gentiles. First Book, Burns, Oates & Washbourne Ltd, London, 1924.

Aquinas, Thomas, The Summa Theologica. Part One, First Number, R. & T. Washbourne Ltd, London, 1911.

Bostrom, Nick, Anthropic Bias, Routledge, New York, 2004.

Carter, Brandon, „Large Number Coincidences and Anthropic Principle in Cosmology” u: Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data; Proceedings from the Symposium, D. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht, 1974, str. 291-298.

Copleston, Frederick, A History of Philosophy. Volume II Medieval Philosophy, Doubleday, New York, 1993.

Copleston, Frederick, Medieval Philosophy, Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, 1952.

Elders, Leo J, The Philosophical Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas, E. J. Brill, Leiden, 1990.

Feser, Edward, Aquinas: A Beginner's Guide, Oneworld Publications, Oxford, 2009.

Jenkins, John I, Knowledge and Faith in Thomas Aquinas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.

Kreeft, Peter, A Summa of the Summa, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1990.

Maimonides, Moses, The Guide for the Perplexed, E. P. Dutton & Company, New York, 1904.

Marmura, Michael E, „Avicenna's Proof from Contingency for God's Existence in the Metaphysics of the Shifa'” u: Mediaeval Studies, Vol. XLII, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto, 1980, str. 337-352.

Popović, Una, „Lenjost kao ukidanje čoveštva. Toma Akvinski o grehu lenjosti i vrlini ljubavi” u: Lenjost (priredili Dragan Prole i Alpar Lošonc), Adresa, Novi Sad, 2016, str. 45-87.

Wippel, John F, The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington D. C, 2000.