@article{TATALOVIĆ_2022, title={GADAMER’S "REPETITION" OF MIMESIS I}, volume={18}, url={https://arhe.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/arhe/article/view/2353}, DOI={10.19090/arhe.2021.35.203-223}, abstractNote={<p class="00-APSTRAKT"><span lang="SL">The research follows the basic characteristics of Gadamer’s rehabilitation of the concept of mimesis, which is of crucial importance for the development of the whole of his project of philosophical hermeneutics. The research points to the underlying assumptions that guide Gadamer’s return to the “original” sense of mimesis. Analyzing Gadamer’s understanding of the notion of play, transformation into the structure and temporal character of a work of art, the research seeks to point out the fundamental dependence of Gadamer’s notion of mimesis on the Platonic tradition, primarily Neoplatonism. Given the Platonic game of understanding of mimesis, which moves through the conflict of truth as correspondence and truth as self-showing of being, analyzes ultimately show that Gadamer returns to mimesis without actually repeating mimesis, and points to the need to abandon the notion of truth if indeed we want to repeat mimesis. The first part of the research, presented in this paper, aims to conduct most of the aforementioned analyzes in order to explain in detail in the second part of the research the previously pointed out conclusion regarding the character of Gadamer’s notion of mimesis.</span></p>}, number={35}, journal={Arhe}, author={TATALOVIĆ, NIKOLA}, year={2022}, month={Mar.}, pages={203–223} }