EUROPEAN RESEARCH PRACTICE: ETHICAL CODE “RESPECT”

Article Sidebar

PDF (Srpski)
Published: Jun 17, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2015.24.181-201
Keywords:
bioethics, ethical codexes, ethical principles, Europe, research

Main Article Content

DEJAN DONEV
Centre for Integrative Bioethics, Kumanovo, Macedonia

Abstract

High standards of ethics provide a higher quality of research and increase substantially its social impact. They promote research integrity and better alignment of research with community needs and expectations.

The European Commission, guided by this goal, began the project “Information Society Technologies”, conducted by the Institute for study of the labor market, which is an attempt of possing a set of ethical and professional guidelines which would serve as a code for socioeconomic research across Europe, known as RESPECT .

The author’s intention is to determine the current position and the application of code RESPECT in terms of the development of common international research space with a “transparent and universally harmonized standards”, ie. to see and examine the possibility and the reasons for (non) implementation of RESPECT on European soil.

Article Details

How to Cite
DONEV, D. (2016). EUROPEAN RESEARCH PRACTICE: ETHICAL CODE “RESPECT”. Arhe, 12(24), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2015.24.181-201
Issue
Vol. 12 No. 24 (2015): PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

Bauman, Z., Postmodern Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, 1993.

Beauchamp, L. T. & Childress, J. F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.

Bortolotti, L. & Heinrichs, B., „Delimiting the concept of research: An ethical perspective“, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28, No.3, 2007, pp. 157- 179.

Carlson, V. R. et al., „The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Past, present and future“, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 57, No. 6, 2004, pp. 695-713.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Science (CIOMS), International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, 2002. http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_nov_2002.html. Pristupljeno: 14.04.2014.

Davis, N. A., „Contemporary deontology“, in Piter Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford, 1993, pp. 205-218.

Dawson, A. & Yentis, S., „Contesting the science/ethics distinction in the review of clinical research“, Journal of Medical Ethics 33, 2007, pp. 165-167.

Diener, E. & Crandall, R., Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.

Dench, S. & Iphofen, R. & Huws, U., An EU Code of Ethics for Socio-Economic Research. 2004. http://www.respectproject.org/code/index.php?id=nl. Pri- stupljeno: 13.04.2014.

Донев, Д., Етика во новинарството. УКИМ, Скопје, 2011.

Донев, Д., Невладиниот сектор како етички коректив на општеството, МЦМС, Скопје, 2008.

European Commission, European Textbook on Ethics in Research, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010.

European Forum for Good Clinical Practice, „The procedure for the ethical review of protocols for clinical research projects in the European Union: A report on the structure and function of research ethics committees across Europe“, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine 21, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1-113.

Evans, H. J., „A sociological account of the growth of principalism“, The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2000.

Friedman, M., „Liberating Care“, in Feminist Ethics, Moira Gatens (ed.), Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1998, pp. 543-584.

Goodyear-Smith, F. et al., „International variations in ethics committee requirements: Comparisons across five westernised nations“, BMC Medical Ethics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2002. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/3/2. Pristupljeno: 14.04.2014.

Hazelgrove, J., „The old faith and the new science: The Nuremberg Code and human experimentation ethics in Britain, 1964-1973“, Social History of Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2002.

Holden, C., „Ethics in social science research“, Science, Vol. 26, 1979.

Idanpaan-Heikkila, E. J., Applicability of CIOMS 2002 Guidelines to Developing Countries, 2003. www.bioteca.ops-oms.org/E/docs/Idanpaan1.pps. Pristupljeno: 14.04.2014.

Institute for Science and Ethics, Draft Final Report: Provision of Support for Producing a European Directory of Local Ethics Committees (LEC’s), The Institute for Science and Ethics, Bonn, 2004.

Israel, M., & Hay, I., Research Ethics for Social Scientists. SAGE, London, 2006.

Jones, R. A., „The ethics of research in cyberspace“, Internet Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1994, pp. 30-35.

LaFollette, H., „The truth in ethical relativism“, Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 22, 1991.

Leaning, J., „War crimes and medical science“, British Medical Journal, Vol. 313, 1996.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, 1979. http:// ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.htlm.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (NCPHSBBR), Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of the Secretary, Protection of Human Subjects, 1979. http://med.umich.edu/irbmed/ethics/belmont/BELMONTR.HTML. Pristupljeno: 14.04.2014.

Oakes, M., „Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator’s guide to IRB“, Evaluation Review, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002, pp. 443-479.

Peach, L., „An Introduction to Ethical Theory”, in Robin Levin Penslar (ed.), Research Ethics: Cases and Materials, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1995, pp. 13-26.

Pettit, P., „Consequentialism“, in Piter Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford, 1993.

Rachels, J., & Rachels, S., The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2009.

Respect Project. http://www.respectproject.org/main/index.php. Pristupljeno: 13.04.2014.

Sayer, Andrew & Michael Storper. „Guest editorial essay“, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 15, No.1, 1997, pp. 1-17.

Singer, P., (ed.). A Companion to Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, 1993.

Thacher, D., „The casuistical turn in planning ethics“, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 23, 2004.

Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law 10, No. 2, 1949. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuernberg.html. Pristupljeno: 13.04.2014.

Weizsäcker, C. F.,. The Unity of Nature. Farrar Straus Giroux, New York, 1980.

White, I. T., Right and Wrong: A Brief Guide to Understanding Ethics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.

World Medical Association, Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for research involving human subjects, 2008. http: //www.wma.net/ en/30publications/10policies/3b/index.html. Pristupljeno: 13.04.2014.

World Medical Association (WMA), WMA History, 2003. http://www.wma.net/e/ history/helsinki.html. Pristupljeno: 14.04.2014.