HOW KANT AND HEGEL PRECLUDED LAW ON HEALTHCARE PROTECTION (LAW ON THE ORIGINAL SIN)

Abstract

Apart from explication of the Kant’s and Hegel’s interpretation of the original sin, according to which this problem has the role of cultural, intellectual emancipation and progressive event, this paper explains completely different meaning of this problem as well. Using the right on scientific and research methodology work and such relation with the primary source – that is by the use of the wider contextual comparative analysis of it, the author in this paper comes to conclusion that the original sin represents deviation of the sexual intercourse (man and woman) and primary cause of severe diseases, transmitted in a numerous ways. With the stated taken into consideration, biblically described God’s opposition to this human offence would be law on healthcare protection, not denial of human freedom, maturation, independence and development of culture, intellect, subjectivity and self-consciousness, as thought by Kant and Hegel. Their interpretation of the original sin are, from that aspect, perceived as inhuman projects of preclusion of such law. As opposed to that, the aim of this paper is provision of human contribution, indicated in specific identification of primary cause of severe diseases, therefore indicating possibilities of their elimination, followed by disappearance of their consequences as well.