FROM THE VALUE OF LIFE TO RIGHTS: EXPLORING THE ABORTION CONTROVERSY
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the principal philosophical and legal approaches to the issue of abortion. It begins with an analysis of Ronald Dworkin’s theory, which emphasizes the „inherent and sacred value” of life, while also addressing the critical objections raised by Nicolai Lazarev. The discussion then turns to Don Marquis’s position, which condemns abortion on the grounds of the fetus’s „loss of a future,” and to the Kantian perspective, which regards the preservation of life as an absolute duty. The article subsequently considers the arguments of Judith Thomson and Anne Warren—Thomson defending a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, and Warren distinguishing between the genetic and moral dimensions of personhood—together
with the critiques advanced by Evangelos Protopapadakis. Finally, the study refl ects on the landmark legal case Roe v. Wade, its subsequent reversal, and the contemporary
ethical and legal challenges posed by emerging technologies such as artifi cial wombs.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Cohen, I. G. (2017). Artificial Womb Technology and Abortion: An Argument-Based
Systematic Review. Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 123-125.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. Knopf.
Frank, K. L. (2001). Nat Effects: How the Internet Has Changed Abortion Law, Policy, and Process. William and Mary Journal of Women and Law, 8(2), Article 4, 345-355.
Guerrero Quiñones, J. L. (2022). „Physicians’ Role in Helping to Die.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 7(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.29548.
Karamatziani, E. K. (2024). Deontological, Utilitarian, and Theological Discussion on Organ Donation. Athens: Papazisis.
Karamatziani, E., M. Zanou, and M. K. Chorianopoulou. (2024). „End of Life Perspectives on the Enlightenment Era: A Comparative Approach.” Arhe, 21(42), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2024.42.77-96.
Lazarev, N. (2005). The Intrinsic Value of Human Life: A Critique of Life’s Dominion.
Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 12(1/2), 1-19.
Marquis, D. (1989). Why Abortion Is Immoral. The Journal of Philosophy, 86(4), 183-202.
Partridge, E. A., Davey, M. G., Hornick, et al. (2017). An Extra-Uterine System to Physiologically Support the Extreme Premature Lamb. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15112. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15112
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2010). „Should the Baby Live? Abortion and Infanticide: When Ontology Overlaps Ethics and Peter Singer Echoes the Stoics.” In Ancient Culture, European and Serbian Heritage, 396-407. Beograd: Serbian Society for Ancient Studies.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2012). „A Cool Hand on My Feverish Forehead: An Even
Better Samaritan and the Ethics of Abortion.” Philosophy Study, 2(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2012.02.005.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2014). „‘Death is Nothing to Us:’ A Critical Analysis of the Epicurean Views Concerning the Dread of Death.” In Antiquity and Modern World: Interpretations of Antiquity, vol. 8, 316-323. Belgrade: Serbian Society for Ancient Studies.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2019). From Dawn till Dusk: Bioethical Insights into the Beginning and the End of Life. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2023). Creating Unique Copies: Human Reproductive Cloning, Uniqu eness, and Dignity. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH. https://doi.org/10.30819/5698.
Protopapadakis, E. D., and Tatia Basilaia. (2024). „On the Assumed Moral Superiority of Passive over Active Euthanasia.” Arhe, 21(42), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2024.42.51-75.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
Savulescu, J., and E. D. Protopapadakis. (2019). „Ethical Minefields and the Voice of Common Sense: A Discussion with Julian Savulescu.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 4(1), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.19712.
Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
van der Haak, Donovan. (2021). „Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 6 (1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.24316.
Warren, M. A. (1973). On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. The Monist, 57(1), 43-61.