OD VREDNOSTI ŽIVOTA DO PRAVA: ISTRAŽIVANJE KONTROVERZE OKO ABORTUSA
Glavni sadržaj članka
Apstrakt
Ovaj članak ispituje glavne fi lozofske i pravne pristupe pitanju abortusa. Počinje s analizom teorije Ronalda Dvorkina, koja naglašava „unutrašnju i svetu” vrednost života, pri čemu se bavi i kritičkim primedbama koje iznosi Nikolaj Lazarev. Diskusija se potom usmerava ka poziciji Dona Markvisa, koja osuđuje abortus na osnovu „gubitka budućnosti” fetusa, kao i ka kantovskoj perspektivi, koja očuvanje života smatra bezuslovnom dužnošću. Članak potom razmatra argumente Džudit Tomson i En Voren – Tomson brani žensko pravo na telesnu autonomiju, a Voren pravi razliku između genetske i moralne dimenzije personalnosti – uz kritike koje razvija Evangelos Protopapadakis. Na koncu, studija se osvrće na prelomni pravni slučaj Rou protiv Vejda, preokret do kojeg je povodom njega docnije došlo, kao i na savremene etičke i pravne izazove što ih donose nove tehnologije poput veštačke materice.
Detalji članka
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Bez prerada 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Reference
Cohen, I. G. (2017). Artificial Womb Technology and Abortion: An Argument-Based
Systematic Review. Journal of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, 123-125.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. Knopf.
Frank, K. L. (2001). Nat Effects: How the Internet Has Changed Abortion Law, Policy, and Process. William and Mary Journal of Women and Law, 8(2), Article 4, 345-355.
Guerrero Quiñones, J. L. (2022). „Physicians’ Role in Helping to Die.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 7(1), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.29548.
Karamatziani, E. K. (2024). Deontological, Utilitarian, and Theological Discussion on Organ Donation. Athens: Papazisis.
Karamatziani, E., M. Zanou, and M. K. Chorianopoulou. (2024). „End of Life Perspectives on the Enlightenment Era: A Comparative Approach.” Arhe, 21(42), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2024.42.77-96.
Lazarev, N. (2005). The Intrinsic Value of Human Life: A Critique of Life’s Dominion.
Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 12(1/2), 1-19.
Marquis, D. (1989). Why Abortion Is Immoral. The Journal of Philosophy, 86(4), 183-202.
Partridge, E. A., Davey, M. G., Hornick, et al. (2017). An Extra-Uterine System to Physiologically Support the Extreme Premature Lamb. Nature Communications, 8(1), 15112. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15112
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2010). „Should the Baby Live? Abortion and Infanticide: When Ontology Overlaps Ethics and Peter Singer Echoes the Stoics.” In Ancient Culture, European and Serbian Heritage, 396-407. Beograd: Serbian Society for Ancient Studies.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2012). „A Cool Hand on My Feverish Forehead: An Even
Better Samaritan and the Ethics of Abortion.” Philosophy Study, 2(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2012.02.005.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2014). „‘Death is Nothing to Us:’ A Critical Analysis of the Epicurean Views Concerning the Dread of Death.” In Antiquity and Modern World: Interpretations of Antiquity, vol. 8, 316-323. Belgrade: Serbian Society for Ancient Studies.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2019). From Dawn till Dusk: Bioethical Insights into the Beginning and the End of Life. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
Protopapadakis, E. D. (2023). Creating Unique Copies: Human Reproductive Cloning, Uniqu eness, and Dignity. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH. https://doi.org/10.30819/5698.
Protopapadakis, E. D., and Tatia Basilaia. (2024). „On the Assumed Moral Superiority of Passive over Active Euthanasia.” Arhe, 21(42), 51-75. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2024.42.51-75.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
Savulescu, J., and E. D. Protopapadakis. (2019). „Ethical Minefields and the Voice of Common Sense: A Discussion with Julian Savulescu.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 4(1), 125-133. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.19712.
Singer, P. (1993). Practical Ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, J. J. (1971). A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
van der Haak, Donovan. (2021). „Death Anxiety, Immortality Projects and Happiness: A Utilitarian Argument Against the Legalization of Euthanasia.” Conatus – Journal of Philosophy, 6 (1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.24316.
Warren, M. A. (1973). On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. The Monist, 57(1), 43-61.