Main Article Content



The article analyzes some of the most important real compositions in Aquinas’s metaphysics: form and matter, supposit and nature, substance and accident, as well as act and potency. On some way, act and potency are identified with the other principles insofar as they designate certain constitutive tendencies which other principles have as common. Because of the lack of the space, the most important composition for the Aquinas’s metaphysics have not been considered that is the real composition between esse and essence in created beings.

Article Details

How to Cite
MILIDRAG, P. (2018). ON SOME REAL COMPOSITIONS IN AQUINAS’ METAPHYSICS. Arhe, 14(27), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2017.27.119-140


Corpus thomisticum, dostupno na: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org (posećeno 21. decembra 2016).

——(1952a) On the Power of God, translated by the English Dominican Fathers, The Newman Press: Westminster, Maryland.

——(1952b) Truth (Disputed Questions on Truth), Translated from the definitive Le- onine text by Robert W. Mulligan, S.J., Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

——(1961) Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Translated By John P. Ro- wan, Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

——(1958–1963) Commentary On Aristotle’s Physics, Books I–II translated by Ri- chard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath & W. Edmund Thirlkel, Books III–VIII translated by Pierre H. Conway, Yale: Yale University Press.

——(1983) Quodlibetal Questions 1 and 2, tr. Sandra Edwards, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

——(1990) Izbor iz djela, dva toma, Prevod Veljko Gortan, Josip Barbarić. Zagreb: Naprijed.

——(1993) Suma protiv pogana, prevod o. Avgustin Pavlović. Zagreb: Kršćanska sa- dašnjost.

——(1995) Opuscula Philosophica, prvi tom, prev. o. Augustin Pavlović. Zagreb: Demetra.

——(1996) Opuscula philosophica, drugi tom, prev. o. Augustin Pavlović. Zagreb: Demetra.

——(1997) Thomas Aquinas’s Earliest Treatment of the Divine Essence: Scriptum su- per libros Sententiarum, Book I, Distinction 8, translated into English with Fa- cing Latin Text, Introdution, Glossary, and Select Bibliography by E. M. Ma- cierowski, New York: State University of New York Press.

——(2001) Pariške rasprave Tome Akvinskoga. Raspravljena i kvodlibetalna pitan- ja, prevod Augustin Pavlović O.P. Zagreb: Demetra.

——(2005) Izabrano djelo, izabrao i preveo Tomo Vereš, drugo znatno prošireno i do- tjerano izdanje priredio Anto Gavrić, Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus.

Abel, Donald C. (1995) „Intellectual Substance as Form of the Body in Aquinas“, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 69: 227–236. Aertsen, Jan A. (1996) Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of

Thomas Aquinas, Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Borgo, Marta (2013) „Early Aquinas on Matter. Notes on the Reception of the Aristo- telian Corpus in the 13th Century“, Tópicos, Revista de Filosofia 45: 83–128.

Clarke, Norris W. S.J. (1952) „The Limitation of Act by Potency: Aristotelianism or Neoplatonism“, The New Scholasticism 26: 167–194.

Chenu, M.-D., O.P. (1964) Toward Understanding Saint Thomas, translated with Au- thorized Corrections and Bibliographical Additions by A.-M. Landry, O.P. and

D. Hughes, O.P. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

Cunningham, Francis A. S.J. (1962) „Distinction According to St. Thomas“, The New Scholasticism 36: 279–312.

Elders, Leo (1993) The Metaphysics of Being of St. Thomas Aquinas, Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Geach, P. T. (1954–1955) “Form and Existence”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian So- ciety, New Series 55: 251–272.

Galluzzo, Gabriele (2007) „Aquinas on the Genus and Differentia of Separate Sub- stances“, Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18: 343– 361.

Gilson, Etienne (1974) „Quasi Definitio Substantiae“, u Armand Α. Maurer, Etien- ne Gilson, Joseph Owens, Pegis Anton C., Quinn John F., Synan Edward, We- isheipl James A. (eds.) St. Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974. Commemorative Stu- dies, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, str. 111–129.

——(2002) Thomism. The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas, Translated by Laurence K. Shook and Armand Maurer, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Goyette, John (2009) „St. Thomas on the Unity of Substantial Form“, Nova et Vetera,

English Edition 7: 781–790.

Hughes, Christopher (1996) “Matter and Individuation in Aquinas”, History of Philo- sophy Quarterly 13: 1–16.

——(1998) „Matter and Actuality in Aquinas“, Revue internationale de philosophie

, no. 204: 269–286.

Iribarren, Isabel (2001) „‘Responsio secundum Thomam’ and the Search for an Early Thomistic School“, Vivarium 39: 255–296.

Kainz, Howard P. (1970) „Separate Substances Revisited”, The New Scholasticism

: 550–564.

——(1972) „Active and Passive Potency“ in Thomistic Angelology, The Hague: Mar- tinus Nijhoff.

Kelly, Matthew J. (1976) „‘Subject,’ ‘Substance,’ and ‘Accident’ in St. Thomas”, The New Scholasticism 50: 206–236.

Kondoleon, Theodore J. (1977) „Substance and Accidents, Potency and Act”, The New Scholasticism 51: 234–239.

Maurer, Armand (1990) Being and Knowing, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Media- eval Studies.

McGovern, Mark (1987) „Prime Matter in Aquinas“, Proceedings of American Catho- lic Philosophical Association 61: 221–234.

Milidrag, Predrag (2014) „Dvostruki karakter stvorenog bića kod T. Akvinskog“, The- oria 57 (4): 5–24.

——(2015a) „Razlika esse–essentia u Sumi protiv pagana, II 52–54“, Filozofija i dru- štvo 26 (2): 414–435.

——(2015b) „Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse“, Theoria 58 (2): 5–32.

Oderberg, David S. (2007) Real Essentialism. New York and London: Routledge. Owens, Joseph C.Ss.R. (1963) An Elementary Christian Metaphysics, Torronto, Bru-

ce Publishing.

——(1967) „Actuality in the ’Prima via’ of St. Thomas“, Mideaeval Studies 29: 26– 64.

——(1978) The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics, 3rd ed., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

——(1982) „Material Substance—Temporal or Eviternal?”, The New Scholasticism

: 442–461.

——(1987) „Aquinas on the Inseparability of Soul from Existence”, The New Scho- lasticism 61: 49–270.

Rousseau, Edward (1956) „Essence and Supposit in the Angels According to St. Tho- mas“, The Modern Schoolman 33: 241–256.

Royce, James E. (1960) „St. Thomas and the Definition of Active Potency“, The New Scholasticism 34: 431–437.

Sweeney, Leo S.J. (1963) „Existence/Essence in Thomas Aquinas’s Early Writings“,

Proceedings of American Catholic Philosophical Association 37: 97–131. Taylor, Richard C. (1979) „St. Thomas and the Liber de causis on the Hylomorphic

Composition of Separate Substances“, Mediaeval Studies 41: 506–513.

West, J. L. A (2007) „The Real Distinction Between Supposit and Nature“, u Peter A. Kwasniewski (ed.) Wisdom’s Apprentice: Thomistic Essays in Honor of La- wrence Dewan, O.P., Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, str. 85–105.

Wippel, John F. (1987) „Substance in Aquinas’s Metaphysics”, Proceedings of Ame- rican Catholic Philosophical Association 61: 2–22.

——(2000) The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas, Washington, D.C., The Catholic University of America Press.

——(2011) “Aquinas and the Unity of Substantial Form“, u Kent Emery Jr., Rus- sell L. Friedman, Andreas Speer (eds.) (2011) Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages. A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, Leiden: Brill, pp. 117–154.

Zedler, Beatrice H. (1948) „Saint Thomas and Avicenna in the ’De Potentia Dei’“, Traditio 6: 105–159.