O NEKIM REALNIM KOMPOZICIJAMA U AKVINČEVOJ METAFIZICI

Bočna strana članka

PDF
Objavljeno: јан 17, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2017.27.119-140
Ključne reči:
supstancijalna forma, materija, supozit, suština, supstancija, akcidencije, akt, potencija, realna razlika

Glavni sadržaj članka

PREDRAG MILIDRAG
Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Univerzitet u Beogradu

Apstrakt

U tekstu su analizirane neke od najvažnijih realnih kompozicija u metafizici Tome Akvinskog, kompozicije forme i materije, supozita i prirode, supstancije i akcidencije, te akta i potencije. Potencija i akt jesu na jedan način poistovećeni s drugim principima utoliko što potencija i akt označavaju izvesne konstitutivne tendencije koje drugi principi imaju kao nešto zajedničko. Zbog ograničenosti prostora nije razmatrana najpoznatija i najtemeljnija kompozicija za Akvinčevu metafiziku, ona suštine i bivstvovanja (esse) u stvorenim bićima.

Detalji članka

Kako citirati
MILIDRAG, P. (2018). O NEKIM REALNIM KOMPOZICIJAMA U AKVINČEVOJ METAFIZICI. Arhe, 14(27), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2017.27.119-140
Broj časopisa
God. 14 Br. 27 (2017): ŠELINGOVA FILOZOFIJA
Sekcija
STUDIJE I OGLEDI

Reference

Corpus thomisticum, dostupno na: http://www.corpusthomisticum.org (posećeno 21. decembra 2016).

——(1952a) On the Power of God, translated by the English Dominican Fathers, The Newman Press: Westminster, Maryland.

——(1952b) Truth (Disputed Questions on Truth), Translated from the definitive Le- onine text by Robert W. Mulligan, S.J., Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

——(1961) Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Translated By John P. Ro- wan, Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

——(1958–1963) Commentary On Aristotle’s Physics, Books I–II translated by Ri- chard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath & W. Edmund Thirlkel, Books III–VIII translated by Pierre H. Conway, Yale: Yale University Press.

——(1983) Quodlibetal Questions 1 and 2, tr. Sandra Edwards, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

——(1990) Izbor iz djela, dva toma, Prevod Veljko Gortan, Josip Barbarić. Zagreb: Naprijed.

——(1993) Suma protiv pogana, prevod o. Avgustin Pavlović. Zagreb: Kršćanska sa- dašnjost.

——(1995) Opuscula Philosophica, prvi tom, prev. o. Augustin Pavlović. Zagreb: Demetra.

——(1996) Opuscula philosophica, drugi tom, prev. o. Augustin Pavlović. Zagreb: Demetra.

——(1997) Thomas Aquinas’s Earliest Treatment of the Divine Essence: Scriptum su- per libros Sententiarum, Book I, Distinction 8, translated into English with Fa- cing Latin Text, Introdution, Glossary, and Select Bibliography by E. M. Ma- cierowski, New York: State University of New York Press.

——(2001) Pariške rasprave Tome Akvinskoga. Raspravljena i kvodlibetalna pitan- ja, prevod Augustin Pavlović O.P. Zagreb: Demetra.

——(2005) Izabrano djelo, izabrao i preveo Tomo Vereš, drugo znatno prošireno i do- tjerano izdanje priredio Anto Gavrić, Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus.

Abel, Donald C. (1995) „Intellectual Substance as Form of the Body in Aquinas“, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 69: 227–236. Aertsen, Jan A. (1996) Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: The Case of

Thomas Aquinas, Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Borgo, Marta (2013) „Early Aquinas on Matter. Notes on the Reception of the Aristo- telian Corpus in the 13th Century“, Tópicos, Revista de Filosofia 45: 83–128.

Clarke, Norris W. S.J. (1952) „The Limitation of Act by Potency: Aristotelianism or Neoplatonism“, The New Scholasticism 26: 167–194.

Chenu, M.-D., O.P. (1964) Toward Understanding Saint Thomas, translated with Au- thorized Corrections and Bibliographical Additions by A.-M. Landry, O.P. and

D. Hughes, O.P. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

Cunningham, Francis A. S.J. (1962) „Distinction According to St. Thomas“, The New Scholasticism 36: 279–312.

Elders, Leo (1993) The Metaphysics of Being of St. Thomas Aquinas, Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Geach, P. T. (1954–1955) “Form and Existence”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian So- ciety, New Series 55: 251–272.

Galluzzo, Gabriele (2007) „Aquinas on the Genus and Differentia of Separate Sub- stances“, Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18: 343– 361.

Gilson, Etienne (1974) „Quasi Definitio Substantiae“, u Armand Α. Maurer, Etien- ne Gilson, Joseph Owens, Pegis Anton C., Quinn John F., Synan Edward, We- isheipl James A. (eds.) St. Thomas Aquinas 1274–1974. Commemorative Stu- dies, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, str. 111–129.

——(2002) Thomism. The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas, Translated by Laurence K. Shook and Armand Maurer, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. Goyette, John (2009) „St. Thomas on the Unity of Substantial Form“, Nova et Vetera,

English Edition 7: 781–790.

Hughes, Christopher (1996) “Matter and Individuation in Aquinas”, History of Philo- sophy Quarterly 13: 1–16.

——(1998) „Matter and Actuality in Aquinas“, Revue internationale de philosophie

, no. 204: 269–286.

Iribarren, Isabel (2001) „‘Responsio secundum Thomam’ and the Search for an Early Thomistic School“, Vivarium 39: 255–296.

Kainz, Howard P. (1970) „Separate Substances Revisited”, The New Scholasticism

: 550–564.

——(1972) „Active and Passive Potency“ in Thomistic Angelology, The Hague: Mar- tinus Nijhoff.

Kelly, Matthew J. (1976) „‘Subject,’ ‘Substance,’ and ‘Accident’ in St. Thomas”, The New Scholasticism 50: 206–236.

Kondoleon, Theodore J. (1977) „Substance and Accidents, Potency and Act”, The New Scholasticism 51: 234–239.

Maurer, Armand (1990) Being and Knowing, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Media- eval Studies.

McGovern, Mark (1987) „Prime Matter in Aquinas“, Proceedings of American Catho- lic Philosophical Association 61: 221–234.

Milidrag, Predrag (2014) „Dvostruki karakter stvorenog bića kod T. Akvinskog“, The- oria 57 (4): 5–24.

——(2015a) „Razlika esse–essentia u Sumi protiv pagana, II 52–54“, Filozofija i dru- štvo 26 (2): 414–435.

——(2015b) „Akvinac o realnoj razlici i dvostrukom određenju esse“, Theoria 58 (2): 5–32.

Oderberg, David S. (2007) Real Essentialism. New York and London: Routledge. Owens, Joseph C.Ss.R. (1963) An Elementary Christian Metaphysics, Torronto, Bru-

ce Publishing.

——(1967) „Actuality in the ’Prima via’ of St. Thomas“, Mideaeval Studies 29: 26– 64.

——(1978) The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics, 3rd ed., Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

——(1982) „Material Substance—Temporal or Eviternal?”, The New Scholasticism

: 442–461.

——(1987) „Aquinas on the Inseparability of Soul from Existence”, The New Scho- lasticism 61: 49–270.

Rousseau, Edward (1956) „Essence and Supposit in the Angels According to St. Tho- mas“, The Modern Schoolman 33: 241–256.

Royce, James E. (1960) „St. Thomas and the Definition of Active Potency“, The New Scholasticism 34: 431–437.

Sweeney, Leo S.J. (1963) „Existence/Essence in Thomas Aquinas’s Early Writings“,

Proceedings of American Catholic Philosophical Association 37: 97–131. Taylor, Richard C. (1979) „St. Thomas and the Liber de causis on the Hylomorphic

Composition of Separate Substances“, Mediaeval Studies 41: 506–513.

West, J. L. A (2007) „The Real Distinction Between Supposit and Nature“, u Peter A. Kwasniewski (ed.) Wisdom’s Apprentice: Thomistic Essays in Honor of La- wrence Dewan, O.P., Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, str. 85–105.

Wippel, John F. (1987) „Substance in Aquinas’s Metaphysics”, Proceedings of Ame- rican Catholic Philosophical Association 61: 2–22.

——(2000) The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas, Washington, D.C., The Catholic University of America Press.

——(2011) “Aquinas and the Unity of Substantial Form“, u Kent Emery Jr., Rus- sell L. Friedman, Andreas Speer (eds.) (2011) Philosophy and Theology in the Long Middle Ages. A Tribute to Stephen F. Brown, Leiden: Brill, pp. 117–154.

Zedler, Beatrice H. (1948) „Saint Thomas and Avicenna in the ’De Potentia Dei’“, Traditio 6: 105–159.