MIMESIS IS SOMEWHERE ELSE I: APPROACHING THE MIMETIC LANDSCAPE OF THE REPUBLIC

Main Article Content

NIKOLA TATALOVIĆ

Abstract

The article attempts to address Plato's question about mimesis by finding the appropriate method within the text of Republic itself. The first part of the paper analyzes why the issue of mimesis is reiterated in the last book of Republic and why the mimetic poet returns to Socrates' speech despite being exiled previously. The article suggests that the mimetic poet may have never been banished and was concealed within Socrates' speech all along. In the second part of the paper, Plato's critique of mimesis is examined by highlighting the difference in content and style of mimesis. The paper proposes a way of reading Plato's critique that applies his method of interpreting an imitative poet to a given interpretation, which reveals insights into Plato's constant game with what and how, teaching and the way it is constructed. This approach sheds light on the essentially rhapsodic nature of Plato's critique of mimesis, which involves a constant interplay between what and how.

Article Details

How to Cite
TATALOVIĆ, N. (2024). MIMESIS IS SOMEWHERE ELSE I: APPROACHING THE MIMETIC LANDSCAPE OF THE REPUBLIC. Arhe, 20(39), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2023.39.257-274
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

Berger, Harry Jr., Couch City. Socrates Against Simonides, Fordham University Press, New York, 2021.

Compton, Todd M., Victim of the Muses. Poet as Scapegoat, Warrior and Hero in Greco-Roman and Indo-European Myth and History, Center for Hellenic Studies, Washington, 2006.

Derrida, Jacques, “Plato’s Pharmacy”, u: Derrida, Jacques, Dissemination, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981., str. 61-171.

Diels, Hermann, Predsokratovci. Fragmenti, I, Naprijed, Zagreb, 1983.

Halliwell, Stepen, “Diegesis – Mimesis”, u: Peter Hühn, John Pier Wolf Schmid, Jörg Schönert (ur.), Handbook of Narratology, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2014., str. 129-137.

Halliwell, Stephen, The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2002.

Halperin. David M., “Plato and the Erotics of Narrativity”, u: R. Hexter i D. Selden (ur.), Innovations of Antiquity, Routledge, New York, 1992., str. 95-126.

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, “Typogragphy”, u: Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, Typography. Mimesis, Philosophy, Politics, Harvard University Press, London, 1989., str. 43-138.

Niče, Fridrih, Vesela nauka, prev. Milan Tabaković, Grafos, Beograd, 1984.

Niče, Fridrih, S one strane dobra i zla, prev. Božidar Zec, Grafos, Beograd, 1983.

Platonis Opera. Recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit Ioannes Burnet. Toms I-V, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1966.

Platon, Država, prev. Albin Vilhar i Branko Pavlović, BIGZ, Beograd, 1993.

Popović, Una, „Platonova kritika umetnosti iz perspektive obrazovanja”, Arhe , VII, 13 (2010), str. 129-147.

Rinella, Michael, Pharmakon. Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity in Ancient Athens, Lexington Books, Lanham, 2010.

Statkiewicz, Max, Rhapsody of Philosophy. Dialogues with Plato in Contemporary Thought, The Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania, 2009.