BIOETIČKA ANALIZA UTICAJA RUTINIZACIJE GENETIČKOG ISPITIVANJA NA POJAM INVALIDNOSTI
Bočna strana članka
Objavljeno:
мар 17, 2021
Ključne reči:
bioetika invalidnosti, genetička ispitivanja, rutinizacija medicinskih mera, pristanak obaveštenog pacijenta, emotivna povređenost, epistemička nepravda, društvena i zakonska diskriminacija
Glavni sadržaj članka
Apstrakt
Tehnološki napredak u biomedicini uvodi nova etička pitanja u medicinsku praksu. Pronalazak neinvazivnog genetičkog ispitivanja je primer koji zahteva proširivanje problematizacije dostignuća biomedicinske nauke. Nakon komercijalizacije neinvazivnog genetičkog ispitivanja u SAD i na globalnom nivou, genetičko ispitivanje se sve više popularizuje kao neophodan deo primarne medicinske prakse i rutinske zdravstvene zaštite. U ovom radu se zastupa stav da rutinizacija genetičkih ispitivanja povećava diskriminaciju u pogledu invalidnosti u profesionalnoj medicinskoj praksi i normalizuje predrasude o invalidnosti u društvu.
Detalji članka
Kako citirati
KAUR, A. H. (2021). BIOETIČKA ANALIZA UTICAJA RUTINIZACIJE GENETIČKOG ISPITIVANJA NA POJAM INVALIDNOSTI. Arhe, 17(34), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2020.34.275-293
Broj časopisa
Sekcija
STUDIJE I OGLEDI
Reference
Agarwal, A., Sayres, L. C., Cho, M. K., Cook-Deegan, R., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2013). Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States. Prenatal diagnosis, 33 (6), 521–531.
Amundson, T. (2008). Bioethics and disability rights: Conflicting values and perspectives. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(2), 111–123.
Andrews, L. B. (1996). Prenatal screening and the culture of motherhood. Hastings L.J., 47, 967 – 998.
Asch, A. (2001). Disability, bioethics and human rights in Albrecht, G., Seelman, K., & Bury, M. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of disability studies. Sage Publications, 297-327.
Farrell, R., Agatisa, P., Mercer, M., Mitchum, A., & Coleridge, M. (2016). Expanded indications for noninvasive prenatal genetic testing: Implications for the individual and the public. Ethics, Medicine, and Public Health, 2(3), 383–391.
Hall, D. E., Prochazka, A. V., & Fink, A. S. (2012). Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = Journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 184(5), 533–540.
Longmore, P. K., (1995). Medical decision making and people with disabilities: A clash of cultures. Journal of Law and Medical & Ethics 23 (1), 82-87.
Mollie A. Minear, M.A., Alessi, S., Allyse, M., Michie, M., and Chandrasekharan, S. (2015). Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues. Annual Review in Genomics and Human Genetics 16, 369-98.
Murray, B. (2012). Informed consent: what must a physician disclose to a patient. Virtual Mentor. 2012; 14(7):563-566. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.7.hlaw1-1207. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/informed-consent-what-must-physician-disclose-patient/2012-07
National Council on Disability (2019). Genetic testing and the rush to perfection (Bioethics and Disability Series). U.S. National Council on Disability.
Newell, C. (2006). Disability, bioethics, and rejected knowledge. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 31(3), 269–283.
Norwitz, E. R., Phaneuf E. L., i Levy, B. (2016) Noninvasive prenatal testing: The future is now. Review in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6(2): 48-62.
Ouellette, A. (2011). Bioethics and disability: Toward a disability-conscious bioethics (Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parens, E. and Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev., 9: 40-47
Parens, E., & Asch, A. (1999). The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. The Hastings Center Report, 29(5), 1–24.
Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act, Pub. L. No.110–374, § 2(1)–(3), 122 Stat. 4051, 4051 (2008)
Ravitsky, V. (2017). The shifting landscape of prenatal testing: Between reproductive autonomy and public health. Just Reproduction: Reimagining Autonomy in Reproductive Medicine, special report, Hastings Center Report 47, no. 6 (2017): S34-S40.
Suter, S. (2002). Routinization of Prenatal Testing. American Journal of Law and Medicine 28, 233-270.
Scully, J. (2008). Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicine. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 9(10), 797–802.
Scully, J. (2008). Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. Lantham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Amundson, T. (2008). Bioethics and disability rights: Conflicting values and perspectives. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(2), 111–123.
Andrews, L. B. (1996). Prenatal screening and the culture of motherhood. Hastings L.J., 47, 967 – 998.
Asch, A. (2001). Disability, bioethics and human rights in Albrecht, G., Seelman, K., & Bury, M. (eds.) (2001). Handbook of disability studies. Sage Publications, 297-327.
Farrell, R., Agatisa, P., Mercer, M., Mitchum, A., & Coleridge, M. (2016). Expanded indications for noninvasive prenatal genetic testing: Implications for the individual and the public. Ethics, Medicine, and Public Health, 2(3), 383–391.
Hall, D. E., Prochazka, A. V., & Fink, A. S. (2012). Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = Journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 184(5), 533–540.
Longmore, P. K., (1995). Medical decision making and people with disabilities: A clash of cultures. Journal of Law and Medical & Ethics 23 (1), 82-87.
Mollie A. Minear, M.A., Alessi, S., Allyse, M., Michie, M., and Chandrasekharan, S. (2015). Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues. Annual Review in Genomics and Human Genetics 16, 369-98.
Murray, B. (2012). Informed consent: what must a physician disclose to a patient. Virtual Mentor. 2012; 14(7):563-566. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.7.hlaw1-1207. https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/informed-consent-what-must-physician-disclose-patient/2012-07
National Council on Disability (2019). Genetic testing and the rush to perfection (Bioethics and Disability Series). U.S. National Council on Disability.
Newell, C. (2006). Disability, bioethics, and rejected knowledge. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 31(3), 269–283.
Norwitz, E. R., Phaneuf E. L., i Levy, B. (2016) Noninvasive prenatal testing: The future is now. Review in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6(2): 48-62.
Ouellette, A. (2011). Bioethics and disability: Toward a disability-conscious bioethics (Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parens, E. and Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev., 9: 40-47
Parens, E., & Asch, A. (1999). The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. The Hastings Center Report, 29(5), 1–24.
Prenatally and Postnatally Diagnosed Conditions Awareness Act, Pub. L. No.110–374, § 2(1)–(3), 122 Stat. 4051, 4051 (2008)
Ravitsky, V. (2017). The shifting landscape of prenatal testing: Between reproductive autonomy and public health. Just Reproduction: Reimagining Autonomy in Reproductive Medicine, special report, Hastings Center Report 47, no. 6 (2017): S34-S40.
Suter, S. (2002). Routinization of Prenatal Testing. American Journal of Law and Medicine 28, 233-270.
Scully, J. (2008). Disability and genetics in the era of genomic medicine. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 9(10), 797–802.
Scully, J. (2008). Disability bioethics: Moral bodies, moral difference. Lantham: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc.