ART AND COMMUNICATION AS A NOVEL EXPERIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper we discuss the deadlocks of defining art in modern culture. The lack of criteria and modernism revisited are of crucial issue in this account. The theoretical mainframe of our approach is founded on the Frankfurt School thinkers (Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin), and of course Jürgen Habermas. This theoretical apparatus also draws on contemporary accounts given by Sorbonne Professor Marc Jimenez and art critic John A. Walker.[1] The paper discusses whether fine art may survive, in what forms – and to what purpose – in an age of mass media and in conditions of rapid networked communication. The paper sets off from the critical role radical art plays in today’s divided yet global world and on the continuing debates between high art and low culture, but reflects on the interaction between art, media and technology.
To support our argument we suggest Body Art and other web/digital and technological applications in art, and the cyber-art currently being produced for the internet. The paper acknowledges the numerous interactions between art and culture in a postmodern pluralistic world, and draws from the vast range of contemporary works of art to illustrate and to criticize theoretical points. The true test of theory in aesthetics is their application to particular cases. When a theory shows limitations in such an application, we gain clues as to what theoretical adjustments or innovations are called for to accommodate today’s works.
The introductory part of the essay comprehensively surveys recent debates on works of art, mass culture and society, and their socio-philosophical significance. The main discussion refers to the work of Walter Benjamin and Jürgen Habermas, aptly commented on by Marc Jimenez;[2] after exploring the complex relationships between culture and art as it’s reflected in that work, the argument provides an account of the 1980s political turn in aesthetics and explicates the impact of new communication technologies in modern culture. The narration is enhanced by specific examples of works of art in the era of mass media, web and digital culture, and underlines both the styles’ pluralism and the variety of parameters affecting the interaction between art and mass media communication. Critical findings and suggestions for further research conclude the paper.
[1] Marc Jimenez, Qu’est-ce que l’esthétique, Paris: Gallimard, 1997; John A. Walker, Art in the Age of Mass Media, London: Pluto, 2001.
[2] Jimenez, Ibid.
Article Details
References
Adorno, Theodor W., Asthetische Theorie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970 [Aesthetic Theory. transl. R. Hulot-Kentor, New York-London: Continuum, 1997]
Adorrno Theodor W., “Culture Industry reconsidered”, in The Culture Industry. Selected essays on mass culture, J. M. Berstein (ed.), 98-106.London and N.Y.: Routledge, 1991.
Arantes, Otilia B. F. and Paulo Eduardo, Arantes, “The Neo-Enlightenment Aesthetics of Jürgen Habermas”, transl. G. Hovarth & M. C. de Paula Soares, Cultural Critique, 49: (2001), 43-57, also at http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/cultural_critique/v049/49.1arantes.html. (acc. May 25. 2015)
Baltzis, Alexandros, “John Walker's Analysis: Pre-modern Production of Meaning and Mass Communication”, in Art in the Age of Mass Media, Walker, John A., transl. [in Greek] H. Papavassiliou, P. Fylaktaki Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, 2010, 11-27.
Baudrillard, Jean, “The Ecstasy of Communication”, in: Foster, Hal, (ed.) 1983. The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture, Port Townsend: Bay Press, 1983, 126-134.
Benjamin, Walter, Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit, 1936, [L’ οeuvre d’ art à l’ époque de sa reproduction mécanisée, transl. P: Klossowski , at: http://ia600805.us.archive.org/2/items/ZeitschriftFrSozialforschung5.Jg/ZeitschriftFrSozialforschung51936.pdf, Paris: Librairie Félix Alcan, 1937, 40-68 (accessed May 25, 2014).
Blumer, Herbert, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
Blumer, Herbert, “Social Problems as Collective Behavior”, Social Problems 18, (1971). 298–306.
Danto, Arthur, “The End of Art: A Philosophical Defense”, History and Theory, 37, 4, (1998). 127-143.
DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”, American Sociological Review 48, (1983). 147-160.
Dunn, Peter, “Digital Highways, Local Narratives”, AND: Journal of Art and Art Education, 27, (1992). 4-5, available at: http://static.and.org.uk/static/pdfs/No%2027.pdf (Accessed May 24, 2014).
Emmanouil, Melita. “Ch. 4. The Science and Technology Contribution”, [in Greek] in History of Art since 1945 in five chapters, by M. Emmanouil, 142-175, Athens: Kapon, 2013.
Jimenez, Marc, Qu’est-ce que l’esthétique, Paris: Gallimard, 1997.
Gablik, Suzi, Has Modernism Failed?, London: Thames & Hudson, 1985.
Goldberg, RoseLee, “Performance: a Hidden History”, in: The Art of Performance. A Critical Anthology edited by Greg Battock & Nickas, Rob. 22-55, / ubueditions, 2010 (accessed May 25, 2014).
Habermas, Jürgen, 1983. “Modernity- An incomplete Project”, in: The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture, edited by Foster, Hal, 3-15. Port Townsend: Bay Press, 1983.
Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, transl. Th. McCarthy, Boston: Beacon, 1984.
Habermas, Jürgen, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, trans. F. Lawrence, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987.
Horkheimer, Max, Theodor W. Adorno, „Kulturindustrie, Aufklärung als Massenbetrug“, in: Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente, 148-196. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1947/2012.
Houlgate, Stephen, 2014. “Hegel’s Aesthetics”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., available at the site (accessed May 25, 2014): http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/hegel-aesthetics.
Leavis, Frank Raymond, Mass Civilization and Minority Culture. Cambridge: CUP, 1930.
Leavis, Frank Raymond, Denys Thompson, Culture and Environment: The Training of Critical Awareness, London: Chatto & Windus, 1933.
Leavis, Frank Raymond, The Great Tradition George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad. London: Chatto & Windus, 1948.
Lewis, Wyndham, Men without Art, London: Cassell, 1934.
Lewis, Wyndham, The Human Age. Book 2: Monstre Gai. Book 3: Malign Fiesta (ill. M. Ayrton), London: Methuen, 1955.
Lyotard, Jean-François, La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir, Paris : Minuit, 1979.
Marcuse, Herbert, “The Affirmative Character of Culture”, in: Herbert Marcuse: Art and Liberation, vol. 4, edited by Douglas Kellner, 82-112, London and N.Y.: Routledge, 1932/2007.
Naylor, Colin (ed.), Contemporary Artists. Chicago: St. James Press, 31989.
Ortega y Gasset, José, The Dehumanization of Art, and Other Writings on Art and Culture. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1956.
Ortega y Gasset, José,. The Revolt of the Masses, transl. authorized, London: Allen & Unwin, 1961.
Park, Robert Ezra, “Cultural Conflict and the Marginal Man” (Introduction), in The Marginal Man. A Study in Personality and Culture Conflict, xiii-xviii, edited by Everett V. Stonequist, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1937.
Park, Robert Ezra, C. W. M Hart, Talcott Parsons et al. Essays in Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1940.
Park, Robert Ezra, Race and Culture, Glencoe Ill: The Free Press, 1950.
Read, Herbert, Dictionary of Arts and Artists, London: Thames and Hudson, 1984 [in Greek transl. A. Pappas, Athens: Ypodomi, 1986.
Rapti, Youli, “The end of autonomy in modern art”, in Humanities and Social Sciences in NTUA: fertile ramifications, [in Greek] edited by I. Milios - K. Theologou (eds.) 271-280, Athens: NTUA publications, 2011.
Shiner, Larry, The Invention of Art. A Cultural History, Chicago: Chicago U.P., 2001.
Smith, Roberta, “Conceptual Art”, in Concepts of Modern Art. From Fauvism to Post-modernism, [in Greek], edited by Stangos, Nikos, 355-375 Athens: MIET, 2005.
Theologou, Kostas, “Technology vis-à-vis the style of the representation: the necessity of the relation between art and technological application”, [in Greek], in Philosophy, Art and Technology, edited by Boudouris, K., 57-70 Athens: Ionia, 2011.
Tisdall, Caroline, Art into Society, Society into Art, London: ICA, 1974.
Walker, John A., Art in the Age of Mass Media, London: Pluto, 2001.
Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society 1780-1950, Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1960.
Zuidervaart, Lambert, 2011. “Theodor W. Adorno”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Ed. N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/adorno/ (accessed May 24, 2014)