THE AESTHETIC ROLE OF PHANTASY AND THE NEW STATUS OF IMAGE IN HUSSERL’S PHILOSOPHY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
For Husserl, the notion of phantasy has manifold roles. The aesthetic role of phantasy is only one of its functions, which is examined in the transcendental analysis of pure consciousness. Husserl in his analyses compares imagination and phantasy. Therefore, he avoids the traditional notion of imagination, Einbildungskraft, and uses the term Phantasie instead. A new understanding of the mediating role of the image in the perceptual and re-presentational structures of consciousness can enable this difference. Husserl has never developed aesthetic theory systemically, although through a new transcendental-phenomenological position, he has shown a special place of aesthetic reflection in the structure of consciousness. He emphasize that phantasy apprehension is different from perceptual and representational modes of consciousness, which opens a new field for aesthetic as a free regime. This enables the traditional idea of dialectics to evolve in a new direction and builds a methodological foundation for a structuralism analysis of the phenomenon of image and body.
Article Details
References
Biemel, Walter. Filozofijske analize moderne umjetnosti, prev. N. Čačinović-Puhovski, Prosveta, Zagreb, 1980.
Biemel, Walter. "La estética de Hegel." en: Convivium, 1962, pp. 147-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rhr.1962.7813
Ćipranić, Miloš. "Fantasmas mudos: una nota sobre la pintura." Escritura e Imagen 15 (2019): 345-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/esim.66747
Erhard, Christopher. Denken über nichts – Intentionalität und nicht-existenz bei Husserl. Walter de Gryter GmbH, Berlin-Boston, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110345841
De Warren, Nicolas. "Towards a phenomenological analysis of virtual fictions." in: Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2.2 (2014), pp. 91-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19079/metodo.2.2.90
Gasset, José y Ortega. Dehumanizacija umetnosti i drugi eseji, LITTERIS, Zagreb, 2007.
Gasset, José y Ortega. La rebelión de las masas. Espasa-Calpe, Madrid, 1964.
Gasset, José y Ortega. Sobre el punto de vista en las artes. Revista de Occidente, Madrid, 1929.
Hartman, Nikolaj. Estetika, Dereta, Beograd, 2004.
Husserl, Edmund. Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht- Boston-London, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0846-4
Husserl, Emdund. Erste Philosophie, Felix Meiner Verlag Hamburg, 1992.
Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erste Buch. Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Husserliana III/1. Edited by Karl Schuhmann. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Translated by F. Kersten as Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, in Edmund Husserl Collected Works, vol. II (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1983). [HuaIII/1]
Husserl, Edmund, Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung Zur Phänomenologie der Anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. The Hague – Boston – London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1980.
Husserl, Edmund. Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft. Vittorio Clostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 1965.
Huserl, Edmund. Kartezijanske meditacije, prev. Prole D., Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci – Novi Sad, 2020.
Kafka, Franz. „A Hunger Artist“, in: The Complete Stories, Schocken Books Inc., New-York, 1971.
Katz, Azul Tamina. "Toward a Husserlian Foundation of Aesthetics: On Imagination, Phantasy, and Image Consciousness in the 1904/1905 Lectures." in: The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 30.3 (2016), pp. 339-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.30.3.0339
Prole, Dragan. Jednakost nejednakog, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad, 2018.
Prole, Dragan. "Redukcija u fenomenologiji i slikarstvu." Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду 41.2 (2016): 67-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2016.2.67-77
Rancière, Jacques. Aesthetics and its Discontents, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2009.
Rancière, Jacques. The future of the image. Verso, 2019.
Todorović, Tanja. „Fantazija i stvaralaštvo u Gasetovoj filozofiji“, u: Arhe 17.33 (2020): 221-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2020.33.221-242