EXPOSITION OF KANT'S CRITIQUE OF RATIONAL THEOLOGY AS A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THESIS ON INCOHERENCE OF THE RELIGIOUS CONFLICTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
What is the significance of Kant's critique of metaphysics and in particular of his critique of rational theology in the context of the question of the incoherence of religious conflicts? Precisely concerning this relationship, this paper will consider a brief history of thinking of a phenomenon called rational theology, then in this context, we will consider Kant's precritical work and later presentation of a critique of rational theology, all in the context of questioning the relationship enumerated with religious conflicts. The hypothesis of this paper is reflected in proving the relationship between Kant's critique of rational theology and the idea of the inconsistency of religious conflicts in such a way that the inconsistency of religious conflicts is based on the results of Kant's critique: the impossibility of certainty and knowledge. So, finally, and according to the results of Kant's main work Kritik der reinen Vernunft: why make religious conflicts serious at all when we cannot objectively prove the existence of the religious idea of God – who is the reason religious conflicts themselves, by their definition, are serious!?
Article Details
References
Akvinski, T. (2005). Izabrano djelo. Zagreb: Globus.
Akvinski, T. (1990). Izbor iz djela: Summa theologiae. Zagreb: Naprijed.
Bartov O., Mck P. (2010) In God's Name: Genocide and Religion in the Twentieth Century. Brooklyn: Berghahn Press.
Bloch, D. (2007). Aristotle on Memory and Recollection: Text, Translation, Interpretation, and Reception in Western Scholasticism. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160460.i-276
Cabezón, J. I. (1998). Scholasticism: Cross-Cultural and Comparative Perspectives. Albany: SUNY Press.
Cornman, J. W., Lehrer, K., Pappas, G. S. (1992). Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Del Val, M. (1938). Index librorum prohibitorum, SS.MI D. N. PII PP. XI iussueditus. Vatikan: Typis Poliglottis Vaticanis.
Filipović, Vladimir (1989). Filozofijski rječnik; NZMH, Zagreb.
Gascón, A. (2007). Reason, Revelation, and Faith of the Heart. Dayton, Ohio: NACMS.
Grbić, S. (2018). Mišljenje religijskih sukoba kao sukobljavanje epistemologija. Theoria vol. 4 no. 4.
Kanterberijski, A. (1997). Proslogion. Zagreb: Demetra.
Kant, I. (1976). Kritika čistog uma. Beograd: BIGZ.
Kant, I. (2000). Latinska djela. Zagreb: Hrvatski studiji.
Kant, Schelling, Schopenhauer. (2008). Ogledi o vidovitosti [Kant: Snovi jednog vidovnjaka protumačeni snovima metafizike]. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
Kant, I. (2000) Pravno-politički spisi. Zagreb: Politička kultura.
Kant, I. (1989). Opća povijest prirode i teorija neba ili pokušaj o ustrojstvu i mehaničkom postanku cijele svjetske zgrade raspravljena po Newtonovim principima [prijevod: Mile Babić, predgovor: Milan Damjanović]. Sarajevo: Svjetlost, str. 139.
Porobija, Ž. (1995). Ontološki dokaz za postojanje Boga. Biblijski pogledi 3 (2), str. 107–137.
Porobija, Ž. (1996) Kozmološki dokaz za egzistenciju Boga. Biblijski pogledi 4 (1), str. 19-38.
Porobija, Ž. (1996). Teleološki dokaz postojanja Boga. Biblijski pogledi 4 (2), str. 105.
Plantinga, A. (1974). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tatakis, V. (2002). Vizantijska filosofija. Nikšić: Jasen.
Wainwright, W. J. (2016). Reason, Revelation and Devolution. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107477117