ARGUMENT, SAZNANJE I ETIKA: RAZUMEVANJE KLJUČNIH POJMOVA U FILOZOFIJI EMPIRIJSKOM STUDIJOM O STUDENTIMA GRČKIH UNIVERZITETA

Glavni sadržaj članka

SPYRIDON STELIOS
KOSTAS THEOLOGOU
SIMONI ILIADI
ELENI MANOLAKAKI

Apstrakt

Empirijska studija sprovedena je tako što se merio stepen do kojeg je shvatanje ključnih filozofskih pojmova (kakvi jesu „argument“,„saznanje“ i „etika“) oblikovano građom koja se predaje u učionici. Mera u kojoj se prešlo s prednastavnih koncepcija na udžbeničke formulacije istraživana je korišćenjem novog upitnika. Zaključci upućuju na to da studenti, načelno, zadržavaju svoja predteorijska shvatanja tih termina. U ovom okviru, neke formalne definicije bliže su zdravom razumu (npr. „etika“), dok neke druge no to nisu (npr. „saznanje“). Dalje, vrednovana je uloga intuicije u tom procesu, što vodi do tvrdnje da prethodni filozofski susreti izgleda da igraju presudnu ulogu u određivanju stvarnog shvatanja.

Detalji članka

Kako citirati
STELIOS, S., THEOLOGOU, K., ILIADI, S., & MANOLAKAKI, E. (2020). ARGUMENT, SAZNANJE I ETIKA: RAZUMEVANJE KLJUČNIH POJMOVA U FILOZOFIJI EMPIRIJSKOM STUDIJOM O STUDENTIMA GRČKIH UNIVERZITETA. Arhe, 17(33), 189–219. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2020.33.189-219
Sekcija
STUDIJE I OGLEDI
Biografije autora

SPYRIDON STELIOS, Nacionalni tehnički univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za humanističke nauke, društvene nauke i pravo, Grčka

Nacionalni tehnički univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za humanističke nauke, društvene nauke i pravo, Grčka

KOSTAS THEOLOGOU, Nacionalni tehnički univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za humanističke nauke, društvene nauke i pravo, Grčka

Nacionalni tehnički univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za humanističke nauke, društvene nauke i pravo, Grčka

SIMONI ILIADI, Nacionalni tehnički univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za humanističke nauke, društvene nauke i pravo, Grčka

Nacionalni tehnički univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za humanističke nauke, društvene nauke i pravo, Grčka

ELENI MANOLAKAKI, Nacionalni i kapodistrijski univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za istoriju i filozofiju nauke, Grčka

Nacionalni i kapodistrijski univerzitet u Atini, Odsek za istoriju i filozofiju nauke, Grčka

Reference

Alauddin, M. & Ashman, A. (2014). The changing academic environment and diversity in students' study philosophy, beliefs and attitudes in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 857-870, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890568.

Baggini, J., & Fosl, P. S. (2010). The philosopher’s toolkit: A compendium of philosophical concepts and methods (2nd edition). UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Booth, J. (2006). On the mastery of philosophical concepts: Socratic discourse and the unexpected ‘effect’. In J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land (Eds), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, 173-181, Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Cato, D. (1987). Getting clearer about 'getting clearer': R. S. Peters and second-order conceptual analysis. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 21, 25–36, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1987.tb00140.x.

Churchill, L. R. (1999). Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of Bioethicists. Daedalus, 128, 253–274.

DiSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age, 49-70, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Duke, E. A., Hicken, W. F., Nicholl, W. S. M., Robinson, D. B., & Strachan, J. C. G. (Eds.) (1995). Platonis opera tomus I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldman, A. I. (2007). Philosophical intuitions: Their target, their source, and their epistemic status. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74, 1-26, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204651_002.

Herzog, A. R., & Bachman, J. G. (1981). Effects of questionnaire length on response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 549-559.

Iliadi, S., Theologou, K. & Stelios, S. (2019). Are University Students Who Are Taking Philosophy Courses Familiar with the Basic Tools for Argument? Teaching Philosophy, 42, 3, 197-220. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil2019726106

Jackson, F. (1998). From Metaphysics to Ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Koutoungos, A. (2008). Between the moral and the rational. Athens: Papazissis Publishers.

Laverty, M. (2009). Learning our concepts. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43, 27–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2010.00753.x.

Lewis, D. (1983). Philosophical papers: Volume I. New York: Oxford University Press.

Locke, J. (1694/1975). Of identity and diversity (Chapter XXVII of An essay concerning human understanding). In J. Perry (Ed.), Personal identity, 33-52. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2003a). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Improving student learning theory and practice – Ten years on. Oxford: OCSLD.

Murphy, P. K. & Alexander, P. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change, 583-616. New York: Routledge.

Prinz, J., J. (2007). Empirical philosophy and experimental philosophy. In J. Knobe, & S. Nichols (Eds.), Experimental Philosophy, 189-208. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pust, J. (2019). Intuition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (URL: , Retrieved: January, 8th 2020).

Rusanen, Α.Μ., Lappi, O., Honkela, T., & Nederström, M. (2008). Conceptual coherence in philosophy education-Visualizing initial conceptions of philosophy students with self-organizing maps. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 64-70. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Salkind, N. (Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Salzberger, R. P. (1997). Ethics outside the limits of Philosophy: Ethical inquiry at Metropolitan State University. Teaching Philosophy 20(2), 169-191, https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil199720220.

Sheppard, C. and Gilbert, J. (1991). Course design, teaching method and student epistemology. Higher Education, 22, 229-249, https://doi.org/10.1007/ bf00132289.

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-w.

Weinberg, J. M., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. (2001). Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics, 2, 429-460, https://doi.org/10.5840/ philtopics2001291/217.

Wortham, S. (2015). Clearing away assumptions through philosophy and research. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34, 125–136, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9419-2.

Najčitanije od istog autora