THE PROBLEM OF THE THIRD ANTINOMY

Main Article Content

MINA ĐIKANOVIĆ

Abstract

In this paper, author investigates the way Kant was trying to resolve the centuries-long discussion on the relation between nature and freedom. Along with paralogisms and the ideal, the antinomies represent “sophisms of the pure mind”. The so-called third antinomy presents the conflict of the adverse views on the relation between nature and freedom, i.e. necessity and freedom. Kant believes that through disunion of the world he can reveal space for human freedom and be able to show that third antinomy will resolve itself in the manner that is not destructive for reality.

Article Details

How to Cite
ĐIKANOVIĆ, M. . (2022). THE PROBLEM OF THE THIRD ANTINOMY. Arhe, 18(35), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2021.35.31-48
Section
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

References

Adorno, T., History and Freedom. Lectures 1964-65, Polity Press, Cambridge 2006.

Allison, H. E., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, Yale University Press, New Haven and London 2004.

Beiser, F. C., The Fate of Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetss and London 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020696

Freydberg, B., Imagination in Kant's Critique of Practical Reason, Indiana University Press, 2005.

Hegel, G. V. F., Istorija filozofije, III tom, BIGZ, Beograd 1975.

Hume, D., An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, University of Adelaide 2014.

Kant, I., Pravno-politički spisi, Politička kultura, Zagreb 2000.

Kant, I., Kritika čistoga uma, Dereta, Beograd 2003.

Kant, I., Metafizika morala, IKZS, Novi Sad 1993.

Kant, I., Prolegomena za svaku buduću metafiziku, Plato, Beograd 2005.

Kant, I., Zasnivanje metafizike morala, Dereta, Beograd 2004.

Kant, I., Kritika moći suđenja, BIGZ, Beograd 1975.

Kant, I., Kritika praktičkog uma, Naprijed, Zagreb 1974.

Kroner, R., Von Kant bis Hegel, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen 1961.

Nancy, J. -L., Finite thinking, Stanford University Press, California 2003.

Perović, M. A., Etika, INED CO „Media“, Novi Sad 2001.

Timmerman, J., „Warum scheint transzendentale Freiheit absurd? Eine Notiz zum Beweis für die Antithesis der 3. Antinomie“, Kant-Studien, 91/2000., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.2000.91.1.8

Zupančič, A., Ethics of the Real. Kant, Lacan, Verso, London-NY, 2000.

Most read articles by the same author(s)