REVOLUTION OF THE WILL FOR LIFE IN CAPITALISM

Main Article Content

VESNA STANKOVIĆ PEJNOVIĆ

Abstract

The paper proves that Nietzsche's will to live as the will to power, Marx's free work as an expression of life, and Deleuze's concept of desire as the will to power is the basis for the revolution of the will to live in capitalism Nietzsche advocates an educational and cultural revolution as a way out of the alienated world in which people are used as objects. By revolution, Marx does not mean only a political or economic change, or even a worldview change, but primarily a "radical change in man and society" in terms of opinion. The revolution is aimed at the abolition of all exploitation, but also the full realization, the highest form, and essence of practice as a free creative activity. Marx stands for a permanent revolution of the whole as a circular process of the absolute idea, the process of self-production mediated through all the special ways of producing objects, and the world as a whole is realized. Deleuze, in collaboration with Guattari, combines the opinions of Nietzsche and Marx and strives to develop a policy appropriate to the complexity of life, pointing out that capitalism is repressive in its uncontrolled imposition and accumulation of desires with the danger of equating man and machine. They advocate experimentation-life, the creation of a "new country" as a project that cannot be reduced to a political solution as the production of the real, the creation of life, through active, positive lines of escape because they open up desire. Desire, which according to Nietzsche is the will to power, is in itself a revolutionary process. The process of desire is joy, and its process takes place through deterritorialization as a line of escape as action because there is nothing more active than escape as "the encounter between two realms."

Article Details

How to Cite
STANKOVIĆ PEJNOVIĆ, V. (2024). REVOLUTION OF THE WILL FOR LIFE IN CAPITALISM. Arhe, 19(38), 269–296. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2022.38.269-296
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

Arthur, Christopher J. 2002. The New Dialectic and Marx’s ‘Capital’, HM Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

Altiser, Luj. 2009. Ideologija i državni ideološki aparati. Loznica: Karpos.

Bataille, Georges. 1988. O Ničeu: volja za srećom. Novi Sad: Književna zajednica Novog Sada.

Delez, Žil. 2010. Pregovori. Beograd: Karpos.

Delez, Žil, i Parne, Kler. 2009. Dijalozi. Beograd: Fedon.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press.

Delez, Žil. 1999. Niče i filozofija. Beograd: Plato.

Delez, Žil i Gatari, Feliks. 1990. Anti-Edip, kapitalizam i shizofrenija, Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, Gilles Deleuze. New York: Zone Books.

Deleuz, Gilles i Guattari, Félix. 1995. Šta je filozofija? Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Deleuze, Gilles i Guattari, Félix. 2013. Tisuću platoa: kapitalizam i shizofrenija 2, Zagreb: Krug Commerce.

From, Erih. 1979. Marksovo shvatanje čoveka, Beograd: Grafos.

Foucault, Michael. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. London: Harvester Press.

Fourquet, François. 2007. „Une intuition de Félix Guattari“ Revue du MAUSS. Vol. 1 no. 29: 555-568. DOI : 10.3917/rdm.029.0555. URL: https://www.cairn.info/revue-du-mauss-2007-1-page-555.htm

Fineli, Roberto. 2017. Apstrakcija versus protivrečnost: Primedbe na Arturovo delo „Nova dijalektika i Marksov Kapital“, U Stvar. Časopis za teorijske prakse, Novi Sad: Gerusija 9: 229-243.

Fink, Eugen. 1984. Osnovni fenomeni ljudskog postojanja. Nolit, Beograd: Nolit.

Gete, Johan Volfgang. 2016. Faust, Beograd: Nova knjiga.

Guattari, Félix. 1995. Chaosophy, New York: Semiotext(e)

Guattari, Félix. 2015. Psychoanalysis and Transversality: Texts and Interviews 1955–1971. South Pasadena, CA : Semiotext(e).

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm. 1966. Filozofija povijesti. Zagreb: Naprijed.

Henry, Michel. 1990. Du communisme au capitalisme, Paris: Odil Jacob.

Kaufmann, Walter. 2013. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kolakovski, Lešek. 1980. Glavni tokovi marksizma. Beograd: BIGZ.

Lefebvre, Henri. 1980. Misao postala svijetom. Zagreb: Globus.

Lošonc, Alpar. 2017. Nota o prvom tomu Kapitala povodom 150. godišnjice U Stvar. Časopis za teorijske prakse, Novi Sad: Gerusija, 9:124-144.

Lefebvre, Henri. 1980. Misao postala svijetom. Zagreb: Globus.

Le Bon, Gustav. 1980. The French Revolution and the Psychology of Revolution. London: Taylor and Francis, Routledge.

Lukács, Georg. 1979. Povijest i klasna svijest. Zagreb: Naprijed.

Lukács, Georg [György]. 1971. Lenin: A Study on the Unity of his Thought. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

Markuze, Herbert. 1966. Um i revolucija. Sarajevo: „Veselin Masleša“.

Marks, Karl. 1960. Ludvig Fojerbah i kraj klasične nemačke filozofije. Beograd: Kultura.

Marks, Karl. 1963. Razlika između Demokritove i Epikurove filozofije prirode, Beograd: Kultura.

Marks, Karl. 1969. Prilog kritici političke ekonomije, Beograd: Kultura.

Karl Marx. 1977. Temelji slobode: osnovi kritike političke ekonomije: Grundrisse. Zagreb: Naprijed.

Marx, Karl. 1973. Kapital: Kritika političke ekonomije I-III, Beograd: Beogradski izdavačko grafički zavod i Prosveta.

Marx, Karl, Engels, Fridrih. 1989. „Nemačka ideologija,“ U Rani radovi, preveo Stanko Bošnjak, 357-421, Zagreb: Naprijed.

Marx, Karl, Engels, Fridrih. 1989. „Prilog jevrejskom pitanju,“ U Rani radovi, preveo Stanko Bošnjak 54-90, Zagreb: Naprijed.

Marx, Karl, Engels, Fridrih. 1989. ,„Ekonomsko-filozofski rukopisi iz 1844“, U Rani radovi, preveo Stanko Bošnjak, 191-347, Zagreb: Naprijed.

Milić, Novica. 2000. „Rizom – Delez: (o četiri gotovo pesničke izreke Heraklita iz Efesa na koje bi se umalo mogla sažeti misao Žila Deleza)“, Časopis za književnost, kulturu i društvena pitanja Reč, br. 58:179-192.

Negri, Antonio. 1999. Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State, translated by Maurizia Boscagli, London: University of Minnesota.

Niče, Fridrih. 1981. Filozofija u tragičnom razdoblju Grka. Beograd: Grafos.

Niče, Fridrih. 1984. Osvit, misli o moralnim predrasudama. Beograd: Rad.

Niče, Fridrih. 1986. Genealogija morala. Beograd: Grafos.

Niče, Fridrih. 1992. Tako je govorio Zaratustra. Beograd: BIGZ.

Niče, Fridrih. 1997. „Šopenhauer kao vaspitač“, Nesavremena razmatranja, Beograd: Prosveta.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1983. Rođenje tragedije. Zagreb: Grafički zavod Hrvatske, Biblioteka „Zora“

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1988. Volja za moć. Zagreb: Mladost.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1999. Antihrist. Zagreb: Izvori.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, 2002. S onu stranu dobra i zla. Zagreb: Dubravka Kozina Publisher.

Nietzsche, Friedrich, 2003. Radosna znanost. Zagreb: Demetra.

Petrović, Gajo 1972. Praxis — Čemu Praxis. Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo.

Petrović, Gajo. 1986. Filozofija prakse, U Odabrana djela, sv. I, Naprijed, Zagreb – Nolit, Beograd.

Reichelt, Helmuth. 2007. „Marx’s Critique of Economic Categories: Reflections on the Problem of Validity in the Dialectical Method of Presentation in Capital“, Historical Materialism,vol. 15, no. 4: 3–52.

Starosta, Guido. 2012. „Cognitive Commodities and the Value-Form“, Science & Society, no. 3: 365–392.

Starosta, Guido. 2017. „The Role and Place of ‘Commodity Fetishism’ In Marx’s Systematic-dialectical Exposition in Capital“,

Historical Materialism, 25 no. 3: 101-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341540

Sutlić, Vanja. 1972. Bit i suverenost, S Marxom na putu k povijesnom mišljenju. Sarajevo: „Veselin Masleša.“

Thoburn, Nicholas. 2003. Deleuze, Marx and Politics. London New York: Routledge.

Toscano, Alberto. 2009. „A Plea for Prometheus“, Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory 2: 241-256.