DANCE AS A HETEROTOPIA AGAINST HEGEMONIC DISCOURSES OF TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCES

Main Article Content

DARIJA RUPČIĆ KELAM

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the dance as a practice and “Other” space, a counterhegemonic space which is affected by the existing social ordering, or existing power of traumatic discourse which is some kind of imposed discourse, while simultaneously resisting it. To explore these premises we will use Michel Foucault`s concept of heterotopia and apply it on the analysis of the dance as an artistic practice and possibilities to understand dance as a heterotopia in which dominant hegemonic discourses are reversed, and as a counterhegemonic space, as authors Christofidou and Milioni, emphases, that has a potential to disrupt and deconstruct hegemonic discourses of the past traumatic experiences or events. We argue that in order to be able to heal the traumas that are engraved in the body, and to understand the body as an expression and a canvas on which a crisis is outlined, we need bodily memories and stories, both those of survival, trauma and wounds, and those of healing. We demonstrate how dance may provide a counterhegemonic space, enable the reconstruction of the place of traumatic events, that are imprinted in body, into places of communication and reconstruction of the meaning, and how can dance invite individual to reflect on their identity and connect their fragmented self. Here we emphasize the meaning of movement – dance that opens the statics of the body to kinesthetic empathy, which in turn allows us to enter the spaces of unspoken body stories. The ethics of touch, proximity, and the ethics of the space between two bodies and what in these spaces "between" means to be, to be in that "not yet" (about-to-be) lead us in this direction. We assert that our bodies are both self-constituted as well as shaped by the collective, the society and history (personal or collective), and that we know by acting, primarily through the body, in synergy with the mind and the environment (enactive approach).

Article Details

How to Cite
RUPČIĆ KELAM, D. (2024). DANCE AS A HETEROTOPIA AGAINST HEGEMONIC DISCOURSES OF TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCES. Arhe, 20(40), 153–192. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2023.40.153-192
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.), Washington, DC, 1994.

Barrero Gonzalez, L. F. (2019). „Dance as therapy: emobodiment, kinestetic empathy and the case of contact improvisation“.

Behrends, Andrea, Müller, Sybille, Dziobek, Isabel (2012). „Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance“, The arts in Psychotherapy 39, 2012., pp. 107-116.

Carroll, N. (2003). “Dance”, in: Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, New York.

Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–51. (2008).

——(2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, New York: Oxford University Press.

Christofidou, Andria and L. Milioni, Dimitra, „Art heterotopias against hegemonic discourses: Dancing the Cyprus conflict“, European Journal of Cultural Studies 20/2022.

Christianson S. A. (1989), „Flashbulb memories: special, but not special“, Memory and Cognition; 17: 433-43.

Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–51. (2008).

——(2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, New York: Oxford University Press.

Cramer, Franz Anton. “Jean-Luc Nancy - Thinking dance“,

https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/tut/gen/tan/20509686.cfm, datum pristupa: travanj, 2022.

Dean, C. (2004). The Fragility of Empathy After the Holocaust, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York 2004.

Decety, J., Mayer, M., (2008), “From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account”, in: Develo pment and Psychopathology 20.

Dehaene, Michiel, De Cauter, Lieven (2008). „The space of play: towards a general theory of heterotopia“, In: Michiel Dehaene, Lieven De Cauter (eds), Heterotopia and the city, Routledge, New York, pp. 88–101.

De Jaegher, H., and Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. (2013). Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(345).

Dee Reynolds and Matthew Reason (ed.). (2012). Kinesthetic Empathy in Creative and Cultural Practices, Intellect, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Dosamantes-Alperson, E., “The intrapsychic and the interpersonal in movement psychotherapy”, American Journal of Dance Therapy (3/1979), pp. 20–31.

Dosamantes-Alperson, E. (1980). “Contacting bodily-felt experiencing in psychotherapy”, In: J. E. Shorr, G. E. Sobel, P. Robin, & J. A. Connella (Eds.), Imagery: Its many dimensions and applications, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 223–236.

Dosamantes-Alperson, E., “Experiencing in movement psychotherapy”, American Journal of Dance Therapy (4/1981), pp. 33–44.

Dosamantes-Alperson, E. (1982–83), “Working with internalized relationships through a kinesthetic and kinetic imagery process”, Imagination, Cognition and Personality (2/1982-83), pp. 333–343.

Dosamantes, Irma. „The intersubjective relationship between therapist and patient: A key to understanding denied and denigrated aspects of the patient's self“, The Arts in Psychotherapy, 19 (5/1992), pp. 359-365.

Faith, Karlene. (1993). Unruly Women: The Politics of Confinement and Resistance, Press Gang, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Federman, Dita. „Kinesthetic ability and the development of empathy in Dance Movement Therapy“, Journal of Applied Arts and Health 2 (2/2011), pp. 137-154.

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2004). Ästhetik des Performativen, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 2004.

Flaum Cruz, Robyn. „Introduction to Marian Chace Foundation Lecture: October 21, 2011 Miriam Roskin Berger, Lecturer“, Am J Dance Ther 34, 2012., pp. 3–5.

Foucault, Michel (1967). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité 5(1).

Foucault, Michel (1980). Power/Knowledge-Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, (ed. Gordon C). Pantheon Books, New York.

Foucault, Michel (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. New York: New York: Pantheon Books.

Foucault, Michel (1996). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

Foucault, Michel (1994). Nadzor i kazna. Rađanje zatvora. Zagreb: Informator.

Foucault, Michel. »Of Other Spaces .« in Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society (pp. 13-29), autor M. Dehaene & L. De Cauter (Eds.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2008. Accessed March 22, 2023,

https://www.hse.ru/data/2013/12/10/1339198680/Michiel%20Dehaene,%20Lieven%20De%20Cauter%20Hetero..ce%20in%20a%20Postcivil%20Society%20%202008.pdf

Funch, B. S. (1997). The Psychology of Art Appreciation, Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.

Gallese, Vittorio (2017). „Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood“.

Gallese, Vittorio. „Neoteny and social cognition: A Neuroscientific Perspective on Embodiment“, in C. Durt, T. Fuchs, C. Tewes (eds.), Embodiment, enaction and culture. Investigating the constitution of the shared world, MIT Press, Boston 2017., pp. 309-332.

Gold, Daniella. »The art of building peace: How the visual arts aid peace-building initiatives in Cyprus«, Available at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/370;

Hamera, Judith. (2011). Dancing Communities: Performance, Difference and Connection in the Global City, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.

Hollander, J. A., Einwohner R. L., »Conceptualizing resistance«, Sociological Forum 19 (4/2004), pp. 533–554.

Hulton, Dorinda. »Sites of micro-political theatre«, PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art 30 (3/2008), pp. 94–103.

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Johnson, Peter (2013). “The geographies of heterotopia”, Geography Compass 7 (11/2013), pp. 790–803.

Kessel, Thomas (2019). „Theodor Lipps: Schriften zur Einfühlung: Mit einer Einleitung und Anmerkungen“, J. B. Metzler.

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western. New York: Basic Books.

Lepecki, Andre, “The Body as Archive: Will to Re-Enact and the Afterlives of Dances“, Dance Research Journal 42/ 2, 2010.

Lipps, Theodor. “The knowledge of other egos”, pp. 719.

Levinas, Emanuel. (2009). Totality and Infinity. Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’Extériorité. Paris: Librairie Générale Française. First published 1971 by Martinus Nijhof.

Marchart, Oliver. (2021). “Political Reflections on Choreography, Dance and Protest”, pp. 2-7, https://www.diaphanes.net/titel/dancing-politics-2126, datum pristupa svibanj 2021.

Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

Massumi, Brian (2002). Navigating moments, http://www.brianmassumi.com/english/interviews.html

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior (A. Fisher, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1990). Fenomenologija percepcije, Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2014). Phenomenology of the Perception, Routledge Classics, New York.

Nancy, Jean-Luc (2000). Being Singular Plural, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Nancy, J. L. (2005). Alliterations.

Nancy, J. L. (2008). “Corpus. Collected essays”, including “Fifty-eight Indices on the Body and The Extension of the Soul”, New York: Fordham University Press.

Nancy, Jean Luc (2004). Corpus, Fordham University Press, New York.

Niče (Nietzsche), F. (2001). Rođenje tragedije, Beograd: Dereta.

Noë, Alva. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Panayiota, Demetriou. »Crossing contested borders: Quid Pro Quo (2011) – A performance act embodying the conceptual and material significance of women’s experience of the divide«, Platform: Journal of Theatre and Performing Arts 2 (10/2016), pp. 51–73.

Parekh-Gaihede, Rose. „Breaking the Distance: Empathy and Ethical Awareness in Performance“, In: Dee Reynolds and Matthew Reason (Ed.), Kinesthetic Empathy in Creative and Cultural Practices, Intellect The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2012., pp. 176.

Shapiro, Lawrence (2011). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.

Sklar, D. (1994). „Can bodylore be brought to its senses?“, Journal of American Folklore 107, str. 9-22.

Slote, Michael. (2007). The Ethics of Care and Empathy, Routledge, London, New York.

Southwick S. M., Morgan A., Nicolau A. L., Charney D., „Consistency of memory for combat-related traumatic events in veterans of operation Desert Storm“, Am J Psychiatry, 142, 1997., pp. 173-177.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/

Taylor, Diana (2003). The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas, Duke University Press, Durham, New York.

Thompson, E. (2001). “Empathy and consciousness”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5–7), 1–32.

Trethewey, A. (1997). „Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization“, Communication Monographs 64/1997., pp. 281–301.

Tselika, Evanthia. »Ethno-nationally divided cities and the use of art for purposes of conflict resolution and urban regeneration«, Visual Studies 33, 2018., pp. 280–294.

Tselika, Evanthia. Conflict transformation art: Cultivating coexistence through the use of socially engaged artistic practices. PRIO Cyprus Centre report 4. Nicosia: PRIO Cyprus Centre 2019.

Valery, Paul (2003). Predavanja o poetici, Beograd: NNK Internacional.

Valery, Paul (1978), „Pesme“, u: Letopis Matice srpske, 154 (421)1, Novi Sad.

Van Giezen A. E., Arensman E., Spinhoven P., Wolters G. „Consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events: a review of prospective and experimental studies“, Clin Psychol Rev, 2005., pp. 935-953.

Wilson, R. A., and Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011. ed.).,

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/of philosophy (Fall 2011 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/

Winograd, T., and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Wengrower, Hilda and Chaiklin, Sharon (ed.) (2020). Dance and Creativity within Dance Movement Therapy – International Perspectives, Routledge, London.

Williams, D. „Dancing (in) the In-between: Contact Improvisation as an Ethical Practice“ Writings on Dance, 15., 1996., pp. 23-33.

Zola, S. M., „Memory, amnesia, and the issue of recovered memory: neurobiological aspects“, Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 1998., pp. 915-932.

Žižek, Slavoj (2008). The Plague of Fantasies, Verso, London & New York 2008., First published 1997.