PLES KAO HETEROTOPIJA PROTIV HEGEMONISTIČKOG DISKURSA TRAUMATIČNIH ISKUSTAVA
Glavni sadržaj članka
Apstrakt
U ovom radu, istražujemo ples kao praksu i kao “Drugi” prostor, protivhegemonijski prostor koji je pod uticajem postojećeg društvenog uređenja, ili postojeće moći traumatičnog diskursa kao neke vrste nametnutog diskursa, dok mu se istodobno opire. Da bismo istražili te premise, koristićemo Fukoov pojam heterotopije i primenićemo ga na analizu plesa kao umetničke prakse i mogućnosti da razumemo ples kao heterotopiju u kojoj su preokrenuti preovlađujući hegemonistički diskursi, te kao protivhegemonijski prostor, kako to naglašavaju Kristofidu i Milioni, koji ima sposobnost da poremeti i dekonstruiše hegemonističke diskurse prošlih traumatičnih iskustava ili događaja. Da bismo bili u stanju da lečimo traume koje su urezane u telo, i da shvatimo telo kao izraz i platno na kojem je ocrtana kriza, tvrdimo da su nam potrebni telesno pamćenje i priče, kako one o preživljavanju, traumi i ranama, tako i one o zaceljivanju. Pokazujemo kako ples može pružiti protivhegemonijski prostor, prostor kadar da rekonstruiše mesto traumatičnih događaja, koji su utisnuti u telo, u mesta komunikacije i rekonstrukcije značenja, te kako ples poziva individuu da reflektuje vlastiti identitet i da poveže fragmentirano sopstvo. Ovde naglašavamo značenje pokreta – plesa koji statičnost tela otvara za kinestetičku empatiju, koja nam zauzvrat dopušta da stupimo u prostor neizgovorenih telesnih priča. Etika dodira, blizine, kao i etika prostora između dva tela i onoga što u tim prostorima „između“ znači – biti u onom „ne-još“ – vodi nas u tom pravcu. Tvrdimo da su naša tela i samosačinjena i oblikovana zajednicom, društvom i povešću (ličnom ili kolektivnom), i da to spoznajemo izvođenjem, i to najpre telom, u sinergiji s umom i okruženjem (enaktivni pristup).
Detalji članka
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Bez prerada 4.0 Internacionalna licenca.
Reference
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.), Washington, DC, 1994.
Barrero Gonzalez, L. F. (2019). „Dance as therapy: emobodiment, kinestetic empathy and the case of contact improvisation“.
Behrends, Andrea, Müller, Sybille, Dziobek, Isabel (2012). „Moving in and out of synchrony: A concept for a new intervention fostering empathy through interactional movement and dance“, The arts in Psychotherapy 39, 2012., pp. 107-116.
Carroll, N. (2003). “Dance”, in: Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, Oxford University Press, New York.
Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–51. (2008).
——(2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, New York: Oxford University Press.
Christofidou, Andria and L. Milioni, Dimitra, „Art heterotopias against hegemonic discourses: Dancing the Cyprus conflict“, European Journal of Cultural Studies 20/2022.
Christianson S. A. (1989), „Flashbulb memories: special, but not special“, Memory and Cognition; 17: 433-43.
Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–51. (2008).
——(2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, New York: Oxford University Press.
Cramer, Franz Anton. “Jean-Luc Nancy - Thinking dance“,
https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/tut/gen/tan/20509686.cfm, datum pristupa: travanj, 2022.
Dean, C. (2004). The Fragility of Empathy After the Holocaust, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York 2004.
Decety, J., Mayer, M., (2008), “From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account”, in: Develo pment and Psychopathology 20.
Dehaene, Michiel, De Cauter, Lieven (2008). „The space of play: towards a general theory of heterotopia“, In: Michiel Dehaene, Lieven De Cauter (eds), Heterotopia and the city, Routledge, New York, pp. 88–101.
De Jaegher, H., and Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. (2013). Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(345).
Dee Reynolds and Matthew Reason (ed.). (2012). Kinesthetic Empathy in Creative and Cultural Practices, Intellect, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Dosamantes-Alperson, E., “The intrapsychic and the interpersonal in movement psychotherapy”, American Journal of Dance Therapy (3/1979), pp. 20–31.
Dosamantes-Alperson, E. (1980). “Contacting bodily-felt experiencing in psychotherapy”, In: J. E. Shorr, G. E. Sobel, P. Robin, & J. A. Connella (Eds.), Imagery: Its many dimensions and applications, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 223–236.
Dosamantes-Alperson, E., “Experiencing in movement psychotherapy”, American Journal of Dance Therapy (4/1981), pp. 33–44.
Dosamantes-Alperson, E. (1982–83), “Working with internalized relationships through a kinesthetic and kinetic imagery process”, Imagination, Cognition and Personality (2/1982-83), pp. 333–343.
Dosamantes, Irma. „The intersubjective relationship between therapist and patient: A key to understanding denied and denigrated aspects of the patient's self“, The Arts in Psychotherapy, 19 (5/1992), pp. 359-365.
Faith, Karlene. (1993). Unruly Women: The Politics of Confinement and Resistance, Press Gang, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Federman, Dita. „Kinesthetic ability and the development of empathy in Dance Movement Therapy“, Journal of Applied Arts and Health 2 (2/2011), pp. 137-154.
Fischer-Lichte, E. (2004). Ästhetik des Performativen, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 2004.
Flaum Cruz, Robyn. „Introduction to Marian Chace Foundation Lecture: October 21, 2011 Miriam Roskin Berger, Lecturer“, Am J Dance Ther 34, 2012., pp. 3–5.
Foucault, Michel (1967). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité 5(1).
Foucault, Michel (1980). Power/Knowledge-Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, (ed. Gordon C). Pantheon Books, New York.
Foucault, Michel (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. New York: New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel (1996). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, Michel (1994). Nadzor i kazna. Rađanje zatvora. Zagreb: Informator.
Foucault, Michel. »Of Other Spaces .« in Heterotopia and the city: Public space in a postcivil society (pp. 13-29), autor M. Dehaene & L. De Cauter (Eds.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2008. Accessed March 22, 2023,
Funch, B. S. (1997). The Psychology of Art Appreciation, Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.
Gallese, Vittorio (2017). „Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood“.
Gallese, Vittorio. „Neoteny and social cognition: A Neuroscientific Perspective on Embodiment“, in C. Durt, T. Fuchs, C. Tewes (eds.), Embodiment, enaction and culture. Investigating the constitution of the shared world, MIT Press, Boston 2017., pp. 309-332.
Gold, Daniella. »The art of building peace: How the visual arts aid peace-building initiatives in Cyprus«, Available at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/370;
Hamera, Judith. (2011). Dancing Communities: Performance, Difference and Connection in the Global City, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.
Hollander, J. A., Einwohner R. L., »Conceptualizing resistance«, Sociological Forum 19 (4/2004), pp. 533–554.
Hulton, Dorinda. »Sites of micro-political theatre«, PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art 30 (3/2008), pp. 94–103.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, Peter (2013). “The geographies of heterotopia”, Geography Compass 7 (11/2013), pp. 790–803.
Kessel, Thomas (2019). „Theodor Lipps: Schriften zur Einfühlung: Mit einer Einleitung und Anmerkungen“, J. B. Metzler.
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western. New York: Basic Books.
Lepecki, Andre, “The Body as Archive: Will to Re-Enact and the Afterlives of Dances“, Dance Research Journal 42/ 2, 2010.
Lipps, Theodor. “The knowledge of other egos”, pp. 719.
Levinas, Emanuel. (2009). Totality and Infinity. Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’Extériorité. Paris: Librairie Générale Française. First published 1971 by Martinus Nijhof.
Marchart, Oliver. (2021). “Political Reflections on Choreography, Dance and Protest”, pp. 2-7, https://www.diaphanes.net/titel/dancing-politics-2126, datum pristupa svibanj 2021.
Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Massumi, Brian (2002). Navigating moments, http://www.brianmassumi.com/english/interviews.html
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of behavior (A. Fisher, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1990). Fenomenologija percepcije, Sarajevo: Veselin Masleša.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2014). Phenomenology of the Perception, Routledge Classics, New York.
Nancy, Jean-Luc (2000). Being Singular Plural, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nancy, J. L. (2005). Alliterations.
Nancy, J. L. (2008). “Corpus. Collected essays”, including “Fifty-eight Indices on the Body and The Extension of the Soul”, New York: Fordham University Press.
Nancy, Jean Luc (2004). Corpus, Fordham University Press, New York.
Niče (Nietzsche), F. (2001). Rođenje tragedije, Beograd: Dereta.
Noë, Alva. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Panayiota, Demetriou. »Crossing contested borders: Quid Pro Quo (2011) – A performance act embodying the conceptual and material significance of women’s experience of the divide«, Platform: Journal of Theatre and Performing Arts 2 (10/2016), pp. 51–73.
Parekh-Gaihede, Rose. „Breaking the Distance: Empathy and Ethical Awareness in Performance“, In: Dee Reynolds and Matthew Reason (Ed.), Kinesthetic Empathy in Creative and Cultural Practices, Intellect The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2012., pp. 176.
Shapiro, Lawrence (2011). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
Sklar, D. (1994). „Can bodylore be brought to its senses?“, Journal of American Folklore 107, str. 9-22.
Slote, Michael. (2007). The Ethics of Care and Empathy, Routledge, London, New York.
Southwick S. M., Morgan A., Nicolau A. L., Charney D., „Consistency of memory for combat-related traumatic events in veterans of operation Desert Storm“, Am J Psychiatry, 142, 1997., pp. 173-177.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-consciousness-phenomenological/
Taylor, Diana (2003). The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas, Duke University Press, Durham, New York.
Thompson, E. (2001). “Empathy and consciousness”, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5–7), 1–32.
Trethewey, A. (1997). „Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization“, Communication Monographs 64/1997., pp. 281–301.
Tselika, Evanthia. »Ethno-nationally divided cities and the use of art for purposes of conflict resolution and urban regeneration«, Visual Studies 33, 2018., pp. 280–294.
Tselika, Evanthia. Conflict transformation art: Cultivating coexistence through the use of socially engaged artistic practices. PRIO Cyprus Centre report 4. Nicosia: PRIO Cyprus Centre 2019.
Valery, Paul (2003). Predavanja o poetici, Beograd: NNK Internacional.
Valery, Paul (1978), „Pesme“, u: Letopis Matice srpske, 154 (421)1, Novi Sad.
Van Giezen A. E., Arensman E., Spinhoven P., Wolters G. „Consistency of memory for emotionally arousing events: a review of prospective and experimental studies“, Clin Psychol Rev, 2005., pp. 935-953.
Wilson, R. A., and Foglia, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011. ed.).,
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/of philosophy (Fall 2011 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition/
Winograd, T., and Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wengrower, Hilda and Chaiklin, Sharon (ed.) (2020). Dance and Creativity within Dance Movement Therapy – International Perspectives, Routledge, London.
Williams, D. „Dancing (in) the In-between: Contact Improvisation as an Ethical Practice“ Writings on Dance, 15., 1996., pp. 23-33.
Zola, S. M., „Memory, amnesia, and the issue of recovered memory: neurobiological aspects“, Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 1998., pp. 915-932.
Žižek, Slavoj (2008). The Plague of Fantasies, Verso, London & New York 2008., First published 1997.