LEGITIMACY AND LEGALITY THE PROBLEM OF FOUNDATION OF PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT

Main Article Content

MINA ĐIKANOVIĆ

Abstract

This paper explores the possibility of defining the principle of philosophy of right as a concept of legitimacy. By legitimacy is not meant the principle of legitimisation of political government. Legitimacy, in philosophical context, can be expressed as unique corpus of fundamental notions of justice and freedom, on which every concept of right must rest, and only then also every political system that aims for recognition. Legitimacy cannot be drawn from legality, but very concept of right – as an order of agency which stands in unity with and differs itself from other orders of agency – must be derived from the concept of legitimacy. Historically expressed through concepts of justice and freedom, principle of legitimacy allows us to determine immanent logic of praxis and by that also of praxis of right.

Article Details

How to Cite
ĐIKANOVIĆ, M. (2018). LEGITIMACY AND LEGALITY THE PROBLEM OF FOUNDATION OF PHILOSOPHY OF RIGHT. Arhe, 14(28), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2018.28.7-24
Section
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

References

Aristotel, Nikomahova etika, Globus-SNL, Zagreb, 1988.

Clawson, R. A., Waltenburg, E. N., Legacy and Legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 2009.

Fihte, J. G., Zatvorena trgovačka država, Nolit, Beograd, 1979.

Habermas, J., “Remarks on legitimation through human rights“, Philosophy and Social Criticism, Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, 1998.

Habermas, J., “Wie ist Legitimität durch Legalität moglich?“, Kritische Justiz, Vol. 20, No. 1, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbG, Berlin, 1987.

Habermas, J., Legitimation Crisis, Polity Press, Cambridge, Oxford, 1992.

Hegel, G. W. F., Enciklopedija filozofijskih znanosti, Veselin Masleša, Sarajevo, 1989.

Hegel, G. W. F., Fenomenologija duha, Ljevak, Zagreb, 2000.

Hegel, G. W. F., Osnovne crte filozofije prava, Veselin Masleša-Svjetlost, Sarajevo, 1989.

Kant, I., Metafizika morala, IKZS, Sr. Karlovci-Novi Sad, 1993.

Kaufmann, Hassemer, Neumann (Hrsg.), Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart, 7. Auflage, C. F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg 2004.

Klippel D., “Naturrecht/Rechtsphilosophie”. In: Thoma H. (eds) Handbuch Europäische Aufklärung. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart, 2015.

Kruspel, I., Legitimität in modernen Demokratien, GRIN Verlag, Norderstedt, 2013.

Lipset, S. M., Politički čovek, Rad, Beograd, 1969.

Makijaveli, N., Vladalac, Moderna, Beograd, 1989.

Merlo-Ponty, M., Humanizam i teror, Mladost, Beograd, 1986.

Monteskje, Š., O duhu zakona, Zavod za udžbenike, Beograd, 2011.

Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York, 1974.

Perović, M. A., Filozofija morala, Cenzura, Novi Sad, 2013.

Perović, M. A., Praktička filozofija, Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad, 2014.

Platon, Država, Dereta, Beograd, 2013.

Platon, Kratil, u: Dela (Ijon, Gozba, Fedar, Odbrana Sokratova, Kriton, Fedon), Dereta, Beograd, 2002.

Radbruh, G., Filozofija prava, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2016.

Rawls, J., Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

Ruso, Ž-Ž., Društveni ugovor, Filip Višnjić, Beograd, 2011.

Schwartz, A., “Legacy, Legitimacy and Possibility. An Exploration of Community Health Worker Experience across the Generations in Khayelitesha, South Africa“, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, Vol. 27, iss. 2, June 2013.

Weinberger, O., “Hans Kelsen as Philosopher“, Introduction to Kelsen, H., Essays in legal and moral philosophy, D. Redidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, Boston USA, 1973.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.