KANT AND SCHLOSSER: ON THE CASE OF ARISEN TONE IN PHILOSOPHY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper is a reading of Kant‘s quarrel with Schlosser approaching it regarding political presuppositions and implications of this polemic. According to the main thesis of this paper Kant‘s texts On the Newly Arisen Superior Tone in Philosophy and Announcement of a Near Conclusion of a Treaty for Eternal Peace in Philosophy – read regarding political and social context – do not represent philosophical debate in a strict sense of this word, but a quarrel between philosopher as a champion of bourgeois political values and the writer whose actions in the public sphere are perceived as a danger for the very existence of freedom of public speech. Reading of specific passages should illustrate parallelism between presupposed values of bourgeois politics and values which Kant posits as prerequisites of every philosophical discourse. In the end, such a reading shows Kant‘s radical republicanism regarding a virtual sphere of public speech in which the authority of individuals or tradition is not tolerated.
Article Details
References
Kant, I., Akademieausgabe, De Gruyter, Berlin, ab 1922:
– Was heißt: Sich im Denken Orientieren?, AA VIII
– Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht,
– Zum ewigen Frieden, AA VIII
– An König Friedrich Wilhelm II, AA XI Kant. I, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, AA V
– Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, AA IV
– Verkündigung des nahen Abschlusses eines Tractats zum ewigen Frieden in der Philosophie, AA VIII,
– Von einem neuerdings erhobenen vornehmen Ton in der Philosophie, AA VIII
– Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?, AA VIII,
Prevodi Kantovih dela:
Kant, I., Kritika praktičkog uma, BIGZ, Beograd, 1979. prev. Danilo N. Basta
Kant, I., Um i sloboda, BIGZ, Beograd, 1984. prev. Danilo Basta
– Ideja jedne opšte povesti usmerena ka ostvarenju svetskog građanskog poretka
– Odgovor na pitanje: Šta je to prosvećenost
– O večnom miru
Kant, I., „Šta znači: Orijentisati se u mišljenju?“ Arhe, 1(1), 2004. str. 251-259, str. 257-259. prev. Miloš Todorović
Kant, I., „O jednom nedavno podignutom otmenom tonu u filozofiji (1786.).“, Filozofski godišnjak, 3, 3/1990. str. 273-284. prev. Danilo Basta
Kant. I., Zasnivanje metafizike morala, Dereta, Beograd, 2004.
Ostala literatura:
Schlosser, J. G., Plato‘s Briefe nebst einer historischen Einleitung und Anmerkungen, Friedrich Nikolovius, Königsberg, 1795.
Schlosser, J. G., Schreiben an einen jungen Mann, der die kritische Philosophie studieren wollte, Friedrich Bohn, Leipzig-Lübeck, 1797.
Schlosser, J. G., Zweites Schreiben an einen jungen Mann, der die kritische Philosophie studieren wollte, Friedrich Bohm, Leipzig-Lübeck, 1798.
Atanasković, L., ,„Kantov pojam kulture: između prirode i slobode“ u Arhe, 25 (29), 2018, str. 111-131.
Deleuze, G., Différence et Répétition, PUF, Paris, 1968. str. 170-171.
Delez, Ž., Razlika i ponavljanje, Fedon, Beograd, 2009.
Derrida, J., „On a Newly Arisen Apocalyptic Tone in Philosophy“ transl. P. Fenves u P. Fenves, „Introduction: The topicality of Tone“ u P. Fenves (ed.), Raising the Tone in Philosophy. Late Essays by Immanuel Kant, Transformative Critique by Jacques Derrida, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1999.
Elijas, N. „Proces civilizacije“, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad, 2001. prev. Dušan Janić.
Fenves, P., „Introduction: The topicality of Tone“ u P. Fenves (ed.), Raising the Tone in Philosophy. Late Essays by Immanuel Kant, Transformative Critique by Jacques Derrida, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1999.
Heimsoeth, H. „Kant und Plato“, Kant-Studien, 56, 3-4, 1965. str. 349- 372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kant.1965.56.3-4.349
Klatt, N., „Kants Kniefall vor der Verschleierten Isis“, Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte, Vol. 37, No. 2, 1985. str. 97-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700739-03702002
Klinger, S. „Intelektuelle Anschauung und philosophische Schwärmerei. Kant und die Aufklärung des philosophierenden Subjekts“, Kantovskij Sbornik, 34, 3, str. 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2015-3-ENG-1
Liotar, Ž., Raskol, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad, 1991. prev. Svetlana Stojanović.
Zammito, J. H., Kant, Herder and the Birth of Anthropology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002.
Zöller, G., „Plato on Revolution. Kant and Political Conservatism“ u A. Falduto; H. F. Klemme (hrsg.), Kant und seine Kritiker, Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, 2018. str. 133-125.