CONTEMPORARY “DISCOVERING“ OF THE PRIMITIVE

Main Article Content

DRAGAN PROLE

Abstract

The outstanding characteristics of methodology applied by so called critical history has been associated by Hegel with adaptation of the stories already known, whereby the thing or the events that are thematized within the story have only secondary importance. The thesis may include indication that the cautiousness is needed, when the avant-garde high praise of the primitive as genuine form of artistic creation is at stake. Namely, it will turn our attention to acknowledgement of skillfully formed story of primitive, which doesn't have so much to do with its own object. This article discloses the question about applicability of our experiences with the critical history to avant-garde rehabilitation of the primitive world.

Article Details

How to Cite
PROLE, D. (2019). CONTEMPORARY “DISCOVERING“ OF THE PRIMITIVE. Arhe, 15(30), 67–81. Retrieved from https://arhe.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/arhe/article/view/2237
Section
TOPIC OF THE ISSUE

References

Barron, Stephanie/Tuchman, Maurice (ed.), 1980. The Avant-Garde in Russia, 1910-1930: New Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Boas, Franz, 1955. Primitive Art, Dover Publications, New York.
Brassaï, 1964. Conversations avec Picasso, Gallimard, Paris.
De Micheli, Mario, 1990. Umjetničke avangarde XX. stoljeća, NZMH, Zagreb, prev. M. Vekarić.
Hair, Ross, 2016. Avant-folk: Small Press Poetry. Networks from 1950 to the Present, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1969. Wissenschaft der Logik I, Werke Band V, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am/M.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 2002. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Reclam, Stuttgart.
Hogrebe, Wolfram, 2017. Metaphysische Einflüsterungen, V. Klostermann, Frankfurt am/M.
Huserl, Edmund, 2012. Prva filozofija. Kritička povest ideja, IKZS, Sremski Karlovci⁄Novi Sad, prev. D. Prole.
Malinovski, Bronislav, 1971. Magija, nauka i religija i druge studije, Prosveta, Beograd, prev. A. Todorović.
Maljevič, Kazimir, 2010. „Suprematizam kao čista spoznaja“, u: Bog nije zbačen, Sabrana dela, Plavi krug/Logos, Beograd, prev. A. Acović [et al.].
Marc, Franc, 2011. „Die neue Malerei“, u: Der Blaue Reiter. Eine Geschichte in Dokumenten, Reclam, Stuttgart, Hg. A. Hüneke.
Micić, Ljubomir, 2008. „Duh Zenitizma“, u: Zenit No I⁄7, septembar 1921, u: Zenit 1921-1926, NBS [et al.], Beograd⁄Zagreb, ur. V. Golubović⁄I. Subotić.
Micić, Ljubomir, 2008. „Kategorički imperativ zenitističke pesničke škole“, april 1922, u: Zenit 1921-1926, No II⁄13, NBS [et al.], Beograd⁄Zagreb, ur. V. Golubović⁄I. Subotić.
Mijušković, Slobodan, 1998. Od samodovoljnosti do smrti slikarstva. Umetničke teorije (i prakse) ruske avangarde, Geopoetika, Beograd.
Novalis, [s. a.]. Hymnen an die Nacht, u: Werke, Stuttgart, Hg. W. Scholtz.
Rancière, Jacques, 1981. La nuit des prolétaires. Archives du rêve ouvrier, Fayard, Paris.
Riegl, Alois, 1929. „Eine neue Kunstgeschichte“, u: Gesammelte Aufsätze, B. Filser, Augsburg/Wien.
Schlegel, Friedrich, 1798. „Fragmente“, u: Ätheneum, Jg. I, Band I.
Schlegel, Friedrich, 1979. Studien des klassischen Altertums, KFSA, Band I, F. Schöningh, Paderborn [et al.], Hg. E. Behler.
Tešić, Gojko, 2009. Srpska književna avangarda (1902-1934), Službeni glasnik, Beograd.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1967. „Bemerkungen über Frazers The Golden Bough“, u: Synthese 17, Dodrecht.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.