TRANSCENDENTAL PHILOSOPHY AND THE SPIRIT OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to approach the question of Enlightenment through the aspect of transcendental methodology. There are not many authors in the history of philosophy who dealt with this method. From this approach, one must emphasize the basic aspects of Kant's and Husserl's philosophy, authors who tried to show both the positive aspect of this historical movement, as well as its disadvantages. They believe that the idea of science based on the concept of the human mind, must be distinguished from the modern ideal of science, which is based on universal reason and the new paradigm of nature. Both of these authors believe that the idea of development and the question of the purposefulness of the philosophical task should be reconsidered.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bernet, Rudolf, „Neistina kod Huserla i Hajdegera“, Arhe 22 (2014): 103-121.
Fuko, Mišel, „Šta je prosvećenost“, u: Kant—Fuko—Habermas, O prosvećenosti, Društvo za proučavanje XVIII veka, Kulturno prosvetna zajednica Vojvodine, Budisava, 2002.
Gasset, J. O. Y., En torno a Galileo. Esquema de la Crisis, Revista de Occidente, Madrid, 1976.
Hegel, G. W. F., Istorija filozofije III, prev. Popović N., Kultura, Beograd, 1964.
Hegel, G. W. F., Osnovne crte filozofije prava, Veselin Masleša-Svjetlost, Sarajevo
Hobs, Tomas, Levijatan, Gradina, Niš, 1991.
Huserl, Edmund, Kriza evropskih nauka i transcendentalna fenomenologija, prev. Đinđić Z., Dečije novine, Gornji Milanovac, 1991.
Husserl, Edmund, Ideja fenomenologije; Pet predavanja, prev. Novakov S. i Đaković V., BIGZ, Beograd, 1975.
Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, Husserliana III/1, Marinus Nijhoff, Den Haag, 1976
Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Husserliana IV, Marinus Nijhoff, Den Haag, 1976.
Huserl, Edmund, Prva filozofija. Kritička povest ideja, prev. Dragan Prole, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad, 2012.
Horkheimer, Max, Kritika instrumentalnog uma, prev. Ladan T., Barišić P., Globus, Zagreb, 1988.
Lok, Džon, Dve rasprave o vladi, Utopija, Beograd, 2002.
Kant, Imanuel, Kritika čistoga uma, prev. V. D. Sonnenfeld, Nakladni zavod Matice hrvatske, Zagreb, 1984.
Kant, Imanuel, Prolegomena za svaku buduću metafiziku, Plato, Beograd, 2005.
Kant, Imanuel, Večni mir, prev. Šnajder M., Valjevska štamparija, Beograd-Valjevo, 2005.
Kant, Immanuel, Was ist Aufklärung? : Thesen und Definitionen. Ph. Reclam, Stuttgart, 1980.
Kant, Imanuel, Zasnivanje metafizike morala, Dereta, Beograd 2004.
Krstić, Predrag, O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o prosvetiteljstvu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2016.
Prole, Dragan, Huserlova fenomenološka ontologija, List, Novi Sad, 2002.
Prole, Dragan, Stranost bića, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci-Novi Sad, 2010.
Perović, M. A., Filozofija morala, Cenzura, Novi Sad 2013.
Ruso, Ž. Ž., Društveni ugovor, Filip Višnjić. Beograd, 2016.
Ruso, Ž. Ž., Emil, Izdanje knjižarnice Rajkovića i Ćukovića, Beograd, 1925.
Russell, Bertrand, History of western philosophy. Routledge, New York-London, 2004.
Voegelin, Eric, From enlightenment to revolution. Duke University Press, 1982.
Wraight, C. D, Rousseau’s The Social Contract, New York, London: Continuum International Publishing Group., 2008.