PRESOCRATIC ANTICIPATIONS OF NON- ANTHROPOCENTRISM

Main Article Content

ŽELJKO KALUĐEROVIĆ

Abstract

Advocates of the questioning  of  the  dominant  anthropocentric  perspective  of the world increasingly strongly are expressing (bio)ethical requirements for a new solution of the relationship between humans and other beings, saying that adherence to the Western philosophical and theological traditions caused the current environmental and not just environmental, crisis. Attempts are being made to establish a new relationship by relativizing the differences between the man and non-human living beings, often by attributing specifically human traits and categories, such as dignity, moral status and rights to non-human living beings. In this paper the author explores antecedents of the views which differ from the mainstream Western philosophy, in terms of expansion of non-anthropocentric ethics, and finds them in the fragments of first philosophers of nature, which emphasize a kind of obfuscation of corporeal and mental elements, i.e. kinship of all varieties of life. Pythagoras, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras and Democritus, in this context, considered certain animals and plants as sacred, i.e. they believed that they are, in a sense, responsible for what they do and, except that they can be driven by a natural desire, to breathe, feel, be sad and happy, they have a soul, discernment, awareness, the ability to think, understanding and reason. Most controversies, according to the author, are caused by the intention, in the modern environment, which is not only temporally but also spiritually distant from the Presocratic epoch, reasonable care on the protection of non- human creatures is replaced with an attempt to introduce the animals and plants into the area of par excellence of human moral phenomenon. In this context, these are attempts to recognize a kind of their moral status, i.e. to attribute to them emotional, spiritual and intellectual characteristics that are similar or identical to the ones that humans have. Finally, difficulties are reflected in the fact that such a (bio)ethics cannot set up and justify moral principles that would apply only to animals and plants, as it is still properly considered that man is the only living being who can act morally.

Article Details

How to Cite
KALUĐEROVIĆ, ŽELJKO. (2017). PRESOCRATIC ANTICIPATIONS OF NON- ANTHROPOCENTRISM. Arhe, 13(25), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2016.25.151-170
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

Aramini, M., Uvod u bioetiku, Kršćan. sadašnjost, Zagreb 2009. Aristotel, Fizika, PAIDEIA, Beograd 2006.

Aristotel, Metafizika, PAIDEIA, Beograd 2007.

Aristotel, O disanju, u: O duši. Parva naturalia, PAIDEIA, Beograd 2012. Aristotel, O duši. Parva naturalia, PAIDEIA, Beograd 2012.

Aristotel, O nebu. O postajanju i propadanju, PAIDEIA, Beograd 2009.

Aristotel, O opažanju i opažajnom, u: O duši. Parva naturalia, PAIDEIA, Beograd 2012.

Aristotel, Retorika, Naprijed, Zagreb 1989.

Aristotelis Opera, ex. rec. Immanuelis Bekkeri, ed. Acad. Regia Borrusica, I-V, Berlin 1831-1870. Novo izdanje je pripremio O. Gigon, Berlin 1970-1987. Svi Aristotelovi navodi sravnjivani su prema ovom izdanju.

Barnes, J., Early Greek Philosophy, Penguin Putnam, New York 2001.

Bentham, J., An Introduction to the The Principles of Morals and Legislation, Internet adresa: http://www.mesacc.edu/~barsp59601/text/105/notes/read/bentham. pdf.

Biblija, Sveto pismo Starog zavjeta, Sv. arh. Sin. Srp. prav. crk., Beograd 2007. Burnet, J., Early Greek Philosophy, The World Publishing Company, Cleveland and

New York 1962.

Chamovitz, D., What a Plant Knows, A Field Guide to the Senses, 2012, Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux; Reprint edition (April 30, 2013).

Cherniss, H., Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy, OCTAGON BOOKS INC., New York 1964.

Čović, A., „Biotička zajednica kao temelj odgovornosti za ne-ljudska živa bića”, u: A. Čović, N. Gosić, L. Tomašević (ur.), Od nove medicinska etike do integrativne bioetike, PERGAMENA / Hrvatsko bioetičko društvo, Zagreb 2009.

Diels, H., Kranz, W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker I-III, Weidmann, Zürich 1985- 1987.

Diels, H., Predsokratovci fragmenti I-II, Naprijed, Zagreb 1983.

Guthrie, W. K. C, A History of Greek Philosophy I-II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1962-1965.

Herodot, Istorija I-II, Mat. srp., Novi Sad 1988. Homer, Ilijada, Prosveta, Beograd 1968.

Homer, Odiseja, Zav. za udžb. i nast. sred., Beograd 2002.

Jaeger, W., The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1967.

Jahr, F., „Bio-etika: osvrt na etički odnos čovjeka prema životinjama i biljkama”, u:

I. Rinčić, A. Muzur, Fritz Jahr i rađanje europske bioetike, PERGAMENA, Zagreb 2012.

Jahr, F., „Zaštita životinja i etika u svom međusobnom odnosu”, u: I. Rinčić, A. Muzur,

Fritz Jahr i rađanje europske bioetike, PERGAMENA, Zagreb 2012. Jamblih, Pitagorin život, DERETA, Beograd 2012.

Jonas, H., Princip odgovornosti, V. Masleša, Sarajevo 1990.

Jurić, H., Etika odgovornosti Hansa Jonasa, PERGAMENA, Zagreb 2010.

Kaluđerović, Ž., „Aristotelovo razmatranje logosa, „volje” i odgovornosti kod životinja”, in: Filozofska istraživanja, 122, god. 31, sv. 2, Zagreb 2011.

Kaluđerović, Ž., Dike i dikaiosyne, Магнаскен, Скопје (Македонија) 2015. Kaluđerović, Ž., Filozofski triptih, Biblioteka ARHE, Filozofski fakultet, Novi Sad

Kaluđerović, Ž., Jašić, O., „Pitagorejska i arapska recepcija ne-ljudskih živih bića”, u:

Nova prisutnost, god. 13, br. 1, Zagreb 2015.

Kaluđerović, Ž., „Presokratsko razmatranje φρόνησις-a i αἴσθησις-a”, u: Filozofska istraživanja, 135, god. 34, sv. 3, Zagreb 2014.

Kaluđerović, Ž., „Talesov vitalizam”, u: Filozofska istraživanja, 139, god. 35, sv. 3, Zagreb 2015.

Krznar, T., U blizini straha, Veleučilište u Karlovcu, Karlovac 2016.

Laks, A., “Soul, sensation, and thought”, in: A. A. Long (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to EARLY GREEK PHILOSOPHY, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999.

Laertije, D., Životi i mišljenja istaknutih filozofa, BIGZ, Beograd 1973. Mattéi, J. F., Pitagora i pitagorovci, Jesenski i Turk, Zagreb 2009. Pavlović, B., Presokratska misao, ΠΛΑΤΩ, Beograd 1997.

Perović, M. A., „Etičke granice bioetike”, u: ARHE, god VI, br. 12, Novi Sad 2009. Platon, Fedar, u: Ijon. Gozba. Fedar, Kultura, Beograd 1955.

Platon, Timaj, Mladost, Beograd 1981.

Rinčić, I., Europska bioetika: ideje i institucije, PERGAMENA, Zagreb 2011. Rinčić, I., Muzur, A., Fritz Jahr i rađanje europske bioetike, PERGAMENA, Zagreb

Rode, E., PSYCHE, Kult duše i vera u besmrtnost kod Grka, Izd. knjiž. Z. Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci. Novi Sad 1991.

Ross, W. D., Aristotle DE ANIMA, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999. Žarden, Dž. R. de., Ekološka etika, Službeni glasnik, Beograd 2006. Žunjić, S., Fragmenti elejaca, BIGZ, Beograd 1984.