CRITICISM AS STRUGGLE BETWEEN MORALITY AND WORLD
Main Article Content
Abstract
Author of this paper investigates the meaning of Schelling’s understanding of criticism, according to his earlier text Philosophical Letters on Dogmatism and Criticism. As a philsophical system that presupposes opposition of freedom and nature, criticism is presented as a struggle between subject and the world. Its opposed system, dogmatism, represents a philosophical system that results in certain passivation of subject. High intellectual appeal of criticism will be shown firstly by an inquiry into the tasks and principles of these opposed systems. Furthermore, investigation will deal with the reasons why Schelling gives the system of criticism positive evaluation, which can only be understood correctly in view of the epochal meaning of Kant’s critical philosophical project. Finally, Schelling’s interpretation is linked to Hegel’s understanding of subjective principle of Kant’s and Fichte’s philosophy. Based on it, it is possible to posit this thesis regarding criticism as a struggle between consciousness and the world more profoundly: as a standpoint of subject’s moral worldview.
Article Details
References
(ed. and trans.) Butler, Clark / Seiler, Christiane, Hegel: the Letters, Bloomington: In- diana University Press, 1984.
(ed. and trans.) Schulte-Sasse, Jochen / Horne, Haynes / Michel, Andreas /Mittman, Elizabeth /Oksiloff, Assenka / Roetzel, Lisa C. / Strand, Mary R., Theory as Practice: A Critical Anthology of Early German Romantic Writings, Minne- apolis: University ofMinnesota Press, 1997, p.73–74.
Adorno, Teodor W., Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampVerlag, 1966. Maluschke, Günter, Kritik und absolute Methode in Hegels Dialektik, Bonn 1974. Brachtendorf, Johannes, Fichtes Lehre vom Sein, Paderborn: Schöningh, 1992. Fichte, Johann Gotlieb, Osnova cjelokupnog učenja o znanosti, Zagreb: Naprijed,
Fichte, Johann Gotlieb, Sämmtliche Werke, Berlin: Veit und Comp, 1845 - 1846. Fihte, Johan Gotlib, Učenje o nauci, Beograd: BIGZ, 1976.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Sämtliche Werke, Band XXVII – XXX, Briefe von und an Hegel, Band 1, Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1952.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Werke, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkampf Verlag, 1971
- 1979.
Henrich, Dieter, Hegel im Kontext, Frankfurt am Main: SuhrkampVerlag, 1967. Hölderlin, Friedrich, Sämtliche Werke, Band 4, Stuttgart, 1962, S. 226-228. Kant, Imanuel, Kritika čistog uma, Beograd: BIGZ, 1976.
Kant, Immanuel, Sämmtliche Werke, Leipzig: Leopold Voss, 1867 - 1868.
Kasirer, Ernst, Problem saznanja u filozofiji i nauci novijeg doba, Novi Sad / Sremski Karlovci: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, 1998 - 2001.
Kroner, Richard, Von Kant bis Hegel, Tübingen: J. C. H. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1961. Manfred, Frank, Der unendliche Mangel an Sein. Schellings Hegelkritik und die An- fänge der Marxschen Dialektik, München: Wilhelm FinkVerlag, 1992.
Perović, Milenko A., „Epohalni smisao Kantove filozofije“, Arhe. Časopis za filozo- fiju, 1 (2004), str. 7 – 21.
Rose, Gillian, Hegel contra Sociology, London: The Athlone Press, 1981.
Schelling, FriedrichWilhelmJoseph, O povijesti novije filozofije. Minhenska prope- deutika, Zagreb: Demetra, 1993.
Šeling, Fridrih Vilhelm Jozef, Forma i princip filozofije, Beograd: Nolit, 1988.