PLATO’S “PARMENIDES”: EXERCISE IN WANDERING

Article Sidebar

PDF (Srpski)
Published: May 11, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2016.25.201-222
Keywords:
Plato, Parmenides, sophists, one, other, many, being, non-being, dialectics, impassable

Main Article Content

NIKOLA TATALOVIĆ
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad

Abstract

The author analyzes the second part of Plato’s Parmenides with the aim to show that dialectical exercise that is carried out here aims to highlight the common ground of Eleatic theory of being and sophistic way of thinking - either-or logic. And that an imminent Plato’s critique of this logic opens up a new area of philosophical investigation whose starting position is the multiplicity of meaning of fundamental concepts of philosophy.

Article Details

How to Cite
TATALOVIĆ, N. (2017). PLATO’S “PARMENIDES”: EXERCISE IN WANDERING. Arhe, 13(25), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2016.25.201-222
Issue
Vol. 13 No. 25 (2016): FICHTE’S PHILOSOPHY
Section
STUDIES AND INQUIRIES

References

Aristotel, Metafizika, Paideia, Beograd 2007.

Cherniss, H., The Riddle of the Early Academy, University of California Press, New York, 1962.

Cornford, F. M., Plato and Parmenides. Parmenides’ Way of Truth, and Plato’s Parmenides, The Library of Liberal Arts, Indianapolis/New York, 1939

Diels, H., Predsokratovci: Fragmenti I, Zagreb, 1983.

Dorter, K., „The Theory of Forms and Parmenides I“, u: Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, State University of New York Press, 1989.

Gadamer, H.-G., „Hegel i antička dijalektika“, u: Hegelova dijalektika, Plato, Beograd, 2003., str. 9-38

Gadamer, H.-G., „Platonov Parmenid i njegov kasniji utjecaj“, u: Platon, Parmenid, Demetra, Zagreb, 2002., str. 243-264

Krämer, H., Arete bei Platon und Aristoteles. Zum Wesen und zur Geschichte der platonischen Ontologie, Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, Heidelberg, 1959.

Krämer, H., Platonovo utemeljenje metafizike. Studija o Platonovu nepisanom učenju i teorija počela, Demetra, Zagreb, 1999.

More, E. P., „The Parmenides of Plato“, u: Philosophical Review, Vol. 25, No. 2., 1916.

Owen, G. E. L. „Eleatic Questions“, u: Logic, Science, and Dialectic, Cornell University Press, Ithaca/New York, 1986.

Owen, G. E. L. „Plato on Not-Being“, u: Logic, Science, and Dialectic, Cornell University Press, Ithaca/New York, 1986.

Palmer, A. J., Plato’s Reception of Parmenides, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1999. Platon, Država, BIGZ, Beograd, 1993.

Platon, Fileb, u: Dijalozi Teetet i Fileb, Naprijed, Zagreb, 1979 Platon, Parmenid, Demetra, Zagreb, 2002.

Platon, Sofist, u: Kratil, Teetet, Sofist, Državnik, Plato, Beograd, 2000. Platon, Teetet, u: Kratil. Teetet. Sofist. Državnik, Plato, Beograd 2000. Vlastos, G., „Degees of Reality in Plato, u: Platonic Studies, Princeton, 1973.

Vlastos, G., „The Third Man Argument in the Parmenides“, u: The Philosophical Review, Vol. 63, No. 3 (Jul., 1954), pp. 319-349

Žunjić, S. Aristotel i henologija, Prosveta, Beograd, 1988.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>